On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote:
The legal case does not hinge on whether the device works. As the agreement > is worded, IH pays IF and WHEN the ERV signs a document that the device > performed to certain specifications. IH does not have an option to bail if > they don't agree with the report. (Which is strange on Darden's part, since > he signed the agreement). There is no need to determine if the device > actually works, for Rossi to win his lawsuit. It will be for the court to determine which provisions of the contract IH are permitted to escape if it finds that provisions separate from those pertaining to the ERV's report have been breached by Leonardo. Eric
