OK Jed, The reason provided might be false or misleading. Still to decide that they are proof for anything is jumping the gun On Apr 13, 2016 13:40, "Jed Rothwell" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No Jed it is not incorrect to follow the advice of the lawyer you pay >> lots of money to . . . >> > No lawyer would tell him that. He made that up. It is nonsense. Anyone > knows that you can submit previously published information as part of a > lawsuit. Publishing does not magically make the document "invalid." You can > submit newspaper articles. I have seen them in lawsuit filings. > > Rossi submitted the license agreement as evidence, which you can now read > on line: > > > http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.2.pdf > > So why can't he submit the report? > > Indeed, the whole lawsuit is meaningless without the report. It is the key > document, and the only real point of contention. If the report is wrong, > the intellectual property is worthless, and the rest of the lawsuit is > meaningless. > > - Jed > >
