Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote:
> regardless of what you think and believe, it is not fair to call someone > an idiot because he made a poor job at one time in 2012. > What other basis is there to call someone an idiot, other than his work? How else can you judge? > It is not fair to call someone a fraud because he made jail time and is > Italian or because you find it hard to negotiate with him. > When have I called Rossi a fraud? I have said he is suspicious, with a dodgy background, time in prison and so on. It is no wonder people think he is a fraud. But I am not a policeman, I have not investigated him, and I do not know whether he is a fraud or not. > No, repeating myself, there are no clear 'evidence' about the status quo. > In that case, why is the status, quo? > The different sides has spoken and left all pertinent and objective data > out. > That is typical for a lawsuit in the beginning. It means nothing. > I have not read the lawsuit stuff carefully. It gives me a headache. I have not commented on it. The only thing I have said is that Rossi claims 50 times output, and I.H. says they could not substantiate the claims. One of them has to be right, and the other wrong. Based on what I know of their skills, I expect I.H. is right. - Jed
