Hi all

Should have included this in the above text.

Source for what "Jed Said"

My apologies.

Kind Regards walker

On 14 April 2016 at 17:40, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> In reply to Jed
>
> "... as I said. I.H. says
>
> they disagree with the report. They say there is no heat. That makes the
> report valueless. I trust I.H.'s expertise in calorimetry more than I trust
> Penon's."
>
> 1) Who at I.H. said this?
> 2) Who is the expert at IH on Calorimetry that you trust so much, that you 
> accept their credentials?
> 3) How did this "expert" physically perform their tests?
> 4) How many days of the Test running did they have access to the plant?
> 5) When did they decide that according to their calorimetry that the plant 
> was not working?
> 6) What are their qualifications?
> 7) Can you point me to a nuclear plant they worked on?
> 8) Can you point me to a report on LENR they have done in the past?
>
> Just the beginning of questioning your assertions.
>
> Kind Regards walker
>
>
> On 14 April 2016 at 16:34, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On another point; and by way of admonishment. If you are going to report
>>> something in the future state the source and quote what they say, otherwise
>>> you will find yourself entrapped again and once again having to back-pedal
>>> the fantasy.
>>>
>>
>> EVERY DAMN THING I SAID can be confirmed in the press releases and legal
>> filing. I pointed to these sources again, and again and again.
>>
>> LOOK HERE Ian!!! You are free to disagree with me. You can say that in
>> your opinion I have misinterpreted the press releases, or I do not
>> understand what the legal papers said about the 3 people who made the
>> evaluation. You can say that for thus and such reason, you think Rossi is
>> right that the machine is producing 80 times input, and the I.H. experts
>> must be wrong. That would all be fine. But DO NOT accuse me of hiding my
>> sources of information when I have repeatedly listed them here. That is
>> rude and it is against the rules. It is damned annoying.
>>
>> I don't mind being told I am wrong, but I resent it when you ignore what
>> I say, and accuse me of saying things I did not say, and doing things I did
>> not do. Stick to the facts, please.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to