Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote:

Bob, I believe the number of ‘inventors’ named on rejected cold fusion
> patents is far more than 30.
>

In my opinion, some of those rejected patents deserved to be rejected.

I do not have a tally, and I do not know how many good ones there were, but
I have seen some that did not seem valid to me. Granted, I know little
about patents. Also, I read the correspondence between the P.O. and the
inventors, and I thought the P.O. examiners were making reasonable demands,
which the inventors did not meet.

I read some of the P.O. correspondence to F&P. In that case, I think the
P.O. was being unreasonable.

- Jed

Reply via email to