Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: Bob, I believe the number of ‘inventors’ named on rejected cold fusion > patents is far more than 30. >
In my opinion, some of those rejected patents deserved to be rejected. I do not have a tally, and I do not know how many good ones there were, but I have seen some that did not seem valid to me. Granted, I know little about patents. Also, I read the correspondence between the P.O. and the inventors, and I thought the P.O. examiners were making reasonable demands, which the inventors did not meet. I read some of the P.O. correspondence to F&P. In that case, I think the P.O. was being unreasonable. - Jed