Axil, this is what I have been saying for years based on Naudt’s 2005 paper on relativistic hydrogen being what Mill’s calls hydrinos and others call fractional or condensed hydrogen ect ect. Mainstream has no issue with relativistic contraction and dilation at near C or equivalent gravity wells where an object reaches trigonometrically significant additional intercepts with the river of vacuum particles passing thru our 3d plane at what “ALWAYS” appears locally to be the speed of light since the local observer is unaware of the dilation or contraction as he approaches C, IMHO this also occur in the negative direction when the normal rate of interception with these particles by a stationary object we refer to as the isotropy is broken by Casimir or similar forces to suppress these wavelengths – forcing them to contract and fit between plates that would be too close for the full wavelength if it remained in our “frame” – It is a neo Casimir theory where the longer wavelengths only appear to be rejected from our perspective outside the cavity and it occurs much faster than the square law we are familiar with from astro physics, it may even explain some of the lacking gamma radiation because even though the spatial displacement is far less the temporal displacement. It could be on the same scale as black holes or as Jack used to suggest “white “ holes with corresponding gravity normally near the plank scale but these forces are being segregated and accumulated to the point where we can start to exploit them in the nanoscopic realm. I think the dangerous radiation could be occurring in these temporally displaced regions and is being softened by Lorentzian translations. Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 11:44 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com Here is the reference that explains the justification for this statement: "Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equivalence principle." Hawking radiation, Unruh radiation and the equivalence principle http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.5564 On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote: Assuming the radiation emitted by a LENR reactor is hawking radiation, it might be possible that the LENR reactor will accelerate in its frame of reference because it changes the nature of the vacuum in its frame of reference relative to the inertial frame of the universe. Hawking radiation makes virtual particles into real particles. Simply stated, if acceleration produces Unruh radiation then Hawking radiation will produce acceleration, if Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equivalence principle. A LENR reactor in space will produce a reactionless drive. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com<mailto:jcol...@gmail.com>> wrote: http://www.examiner.com/article/has-the-impossible-em-drive-being-tested-by-nasa-finally-been-explained
