Axil, I agree but think some engineering is required to avoid cancellation of spatial forces, all the anomalous regions are unlikely to favor one spatial axis over another without some organized self assembly, otherwise it which would mostly cancel out or in the case of the EM drive, need geometrical constraints to force a bias. I do however think a raw reactor could very easily demonstrate variable drag on the ether when placed on a beam balance and weights are thrown into the opposing scale, IMHO a battery operated “on” reactor in the scale basket would delay the balancing action compared to an “off” reactor in the same basket. This would also give a better reading on how much traction is available before we try to focus it in any specific direction to unbalance normal reactionary forces. Just occurred to me but an “on” raw reactor in space should actually cause orbital decay as the ship is now linked to regions in a different inertial frame creating friction to normal displacement – the EM drive may create push using microwave energy but I think reactors are basically an energy capture system and as such oppose the natural flow of VP and unless we reverse the design away from OU and intentionally over drive them in some manner will always act more like ether brakes than ether drives. Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 11:44 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com Here is the reference that explains the justification for this statement: "Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equivalence principle." Hawking radiation, Unruh radiation and the equivalence principle http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.5564 On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote: Assuming the radiation emitted by a LENR reactor is hawking radiation, it might be possible that the LENR reactor will accelerate in its frame of reference because it changes the nature of the vacuum in its frame of reference relative to the inertial frame of the universe. Hawking radiation makes virtual particles into real particles. Simply stated, if acceleration produces Unruh radiation then Hawking radiation will produce acceleration, if Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equivalence principle. A LENR reactor in space will produce a reactionless drive. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com<mailto:jcol...@gmail.com>> wrote: http://www.examiner.com/article/has-the-impossible-em-drive-being-tested-by-nasa-finally-been-explained
