On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:34 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
Like you, I suspect the COP has been exaggerated but perhaps not as much as > you suggest. I believe the contract for the 1 MW plant called for a COP>4. The license agreement talked about a COP of 4. The second amendment amended the relevant section, stipulating a COP of between 2.6 and 6, with IH owing 89 million multiplied by whatever ratio between these two numbers was observed. http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.4.pdf I am doubtful Rossi will get a penny out of this lawsuit, and IH may even find a way to recover some of the 11.5 million it has already paid him. What would be really great, though, would be if Rossi were required to submit to a new test under the direction of the court, and under the scrutiny of court-appointed experts. If a settlement occurs, we may not learn anything. Until the lawsuit winds down, Rossi's new business partners will be assuming a lot of risk in working with him. Eric
