Peter, this is how private R&D works. Neither Leonardo Corp. nor IH owe the public any information.
Harry On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > *dear Jed,* > *i have just been writing my answer to this assertion:* > > *Announced a year ago this could be an argument but even then how could > Rossi depart from the test plan; how many reactors were "inoperable" and in > which sense? Flawed measurements have to be reported immediately and what > unsuitable measuring instruments were used- for a long year for > temperature, pressure, flow- seismometers, dynamometers, microscopes?* > > *Now post-factum after 4 reports of the ERV, after alternative > measurements by IH employees. such arguments are dead.* > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: >> >>> IH has apparently sent Krivit a copy of their legal response to the >>> court case. >>> >> I expect he found it by some other means. >> >> From a quick scan it doesn’t look like they have stated the E-Cat doesn’t >>> work . . . >>> >> >> It says this on p. 2, in the footnote: >> >> "Guaranteed Performance Test" that the Complaint purposely ignores (such >> as departing from the purported test plan, ignoring inoperable reactors, >> relying on flawed measurements, and using unsuitable measuring devices). >> >> - Jed >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
