What "fabrications of a delusional career criminal"?
You just repeated what Goatguy said without an iota of evidence to show
it was true, writing that that was what happened. So no, you haven't
"got this straight."
On 7/3/2016 12:49 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
So let me see if I’ve got this straight. It’s not biased to the repeat the
fabrications of a delusional career criminal, and to persist with non-stop
trolling of this “Rossi says” crap, but it is biased for anyone else to
comment on the most likely way he pulled off the latest scam?
From: a.ashfield
"It was clever on Rossi’s part, but the type of cleaver that can cost him
dearly, in the end."
Your bias is showing again. Goatguy suggested a possible method to scam the
results and then you take it as read that that was done. Really?
It would have been easier to fudge the sensors or the instrumentation
reading them. That does not mean that was what happened either.
Jones Beene wrote: From: Jed Rothwell
Someone pointed out to me that at such low temperatures, you would probably
use the hot fluid to heat the equipment directly before returning it, rather
than going through a heat exchanger.
- Jed
Didn’t you see the post on NBF from GoatGuy - which nails the easy way to
cheat with this type of setup? It’s all about letting air in the line, in
the “hidden room” where IH was not permitted to even take a look. This is
not accidental air leakage, but planned that way – to deceive. Of course,
GoatGuy’s explanation doesn’t work if you have a real customer buying real
steam, since they immediately know they are getting shortchanged.
That is why this case will likely be dismissed before it ever gets to trial.
When the swindle of claiming for months that “the customer" is buying a
$1000 per day of steam, is shown to be a make-believe customer with no use
for steam at all (instead it is your own business partner who is buying
nothing) … when this fraud is brought to the attention of the Court, the
claim against IH will likely be tossed.
Goat guy, who seems to have an excellent grasp of this situation, came up
with the explanation -- which can be seen here by scrolling down to his post
in the comments.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2016/04/rossi-1-megawatt-energy-catalyzer-is.html
Basically, in the center of the “reactor shelter” is a box labeled “water
reservoir” which has 2 inlets and 2 outlets.
Inlet 1, top = tap water from municipal line
Inlet 2, bot = return from steam condensers
Outlet 1, top = water to first half of E-cats and then to water tank 1
Outlet 2, bot = water to second half of E-cats and then to water tank 2
All that would be needed would be for the steam-condenser loop to have a
planned amount of air in the line for this to be a really misleading COP > 1
system. Sensors that measure gas flow cannot discriminate 100% steam from
50:50 steam from 0% hot air. Likewise, with a bit of flim-flam, most of the
heat emitted could be combined back into the circulating loop (of which
there are 2: (water tank 1) → (input to ECat₁) → (combine with reservoir
tank water) → (back into ECat₁) → (back to water tank 1) … repeated for the
bottom half…. Etc. Etc. An ingenious scam.
It was clever on Rossi’s part, but the type of cleaver that can cost him
dearly, in the end.
