I have recently said that Rossi's technology...a lithium 7 burner... would be regulated by the nuclear authorities. I have recently said that Rossi's tech would be restricted to the electric utilities. I have recently said that Rossi's reaction is producing muons by the ton and would disable any electronics within a mile through EMF interference. Rossi's tech will not be a trillion dollar technology because of these limitations. Rossi's tech is a low density power producer so that his reactors are stable and will not melt down. On the other hand, BLP produces high density power without lithium and the fear of meltdown.
I am now an ardent admirer of Mills who has solve most of the issues inherent in high power density LENR reactor design. I love high power density in a reactor. Mills can get top of the line power density out of just hydrogen fuel without melting down the reactor, something that Rossi has been trying to do for years now. The liquid electron idea is great and its implementation is even better. You can't meltdown something that is already melted. An miracle upon miracles is the self driven plasma reaction that can last for minutes without input stimulation. No one would have ever imagined that this astounding feat was even possible. And most satisfy trait of all, Mills is completely open and will explain how is tech works. Rossi on the other hand has sacrificed power density for 5 sigma. He has cut his power density by a factor of 1000 to keep his reactor from early destruction. Low reactor power density paves the road to system failure. Mills can improve power density even more by adding CAT/MOUSE based multi electrode operation. Mills can add magnetic protection to his structure to produce a hot fusion/LENR hybrid design with huge power density...a 100 megawatt reactor in a breadbox. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:26 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > There are seven videos at https://www.youtube.com/playli > st?list=PLw1e-SwMe6eJf4Rr32w2UybIWOJ2cODEQ > > You can skip the first two that are basic introductions. > The third video is the longest. In it Mills describes his theories and > then goes on to describe the SunCell in detail. > The fourth video is short and covers independent verification of energy > out. > The fifth video describes the engineering firm contracted to turn the > SunCell into a commercial device. They forecast they will have a working > model in Jan 2017, a basic prototype by mid year and a commercial unit at > the end of 2017. > The sixth video covers the design and possibilities for the PV cells to > convert the light energy into electricity. > The seventh video cover their marketing strategy, > > I thought Mills argued points for his theory well. I felt the time line > for commercial production was optimistic but got the impression that this > time they are serious about making commercial units.. > >
