Has Holmlid enlisted outside help in characterizing these charged and neutral radiations in this latest paper? I've been hoping he would do so for years. To summarize what has instead been reported in papers leading up to this one: an alleged muon, pion and kaon radiation field, inferred from the timings of signals seen in a self-built muon detector and oscilloscope by a researcher with no prior experience detecting muons and without the benefit of calibrations against a known muon flux, all reported in papers that thoroughly mix together theoretical constructs (ultra-dense deuterium, etc.) with low-level experimental observations.
I have zero trust in Holmlid to accurately report muons, let alone kaons or pions. I will not consider a conclusions of muons to be credible until a reputable third party with established expertise in characterizing charged particle radiations signs off on this. I continue to take interest in whatever experimental phenomenon Holmlid is investigating, however. Eric
