Rossi kindled interest in a similar fashion to Bernie Madoff! ________________________________ From: Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:38 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:33 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: See http://www.e-catworld.com/why-i-believe-in-the-e-cat/ Like it or not, Rossi rekindled interest in LENR like no other has. Where's the BEEF?? Where's the damned water-heater the World was promised..? (Where's the 'Orbo' Revolution, for that matter...) Damned 'private-property' interests. Capitalist 'efficiency' (Over-Unity, at that) at its best... Pfft. AA On 4/2/2017 12:12 PM, Che wrote: Have I missed something? Why is Rossi still being taken seriously here on vortex-L? At the very least, his proprietary secrecy has cost Science a great deal. On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:31 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: It has been evident for years that Rossi has been spending time boning up on atomic physics. What he writes here makes sense to me, but perhaps others here, more expert than me, will comment. 1. Andrea Rossi March 31, 2017 at 12:55 PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=223#comment-1273347> Eugene Atthove: As a matter of fact, neutrinos and antineutrinos in the nuclear physics equations are “tricks”, assumed to be real to obtain the respect of the leptons conservation law. For example: the neutron decay, of which we talked yesterday, gives one proton, one electron and one antineutrino: why? Because at the left of the neutron decay equation you do not have leptons, at the right you have one lepton and this would be against the leptons number conservation law: therefore you have to assume the emission of an antineutrino, so you have one plus lepton ( the electron ), one minus lepton ( the antineutrino ) = zero leptons also at the right of the equation, so that the law is respected. You could say that this sounds a little bit tricky, like an artifact, but…it is, albeit without this trick the Standard Model would brutally crack down: realistically, between a crack and a trick is better the trick. Warm Regards, A.R.
