On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote:
> > Rossi kindled interest in a similar fashion to Bernie Madoff! > That's about the most sense I've read here today. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:38 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics. > > > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:33 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > >> See http://www.e-catworld.com/why-i-believe-in-the-e-cat/ >> Like it or not, Rossi rekindled interest in LENR like no other has. >> > > > Where's the BEEF?? > Where's the damned water-heater the World was promised..? > (Where's the 'Orbo' Revolution, for that matter...) > > Damned 'private-property' interests. > Capitalist 'efficiency' (Over-Unity, at that) at its best... > Pfft. > > > > > > > > > >> AA >> >> >> >> On 4/2/2017 12:12 PM, Che wrote: >> >> >> Have I missed something? Why is Rossi still being taken seriously here on >> vortex-L? >> >> At the very least, his proprietary secrecy has cost Science a great deal. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:31 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> >> wrote: >> >>> It has been evident for years that Rossi has been spending time boning >>> up on atomic physics. >>> >>> What he writes here makes sense to me, but perhaps others here, more >>> expert than me, will comment. >>> >>> >>> 1. Andrea Rossi >>> March 31, 2017 at 12:55 PM >>> >>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=223#comment-1273347> >>> >>> Eugene Atthove: >>> As a matter of fact, neutrinos and antineutrinos in the nuclear >>> physics equations are “tricks”, assumed to be real to obtain the respect >>> of >>> the leptons conservation law. >>> For example: the neutron decay, of which we talked yesterday, gives >>> one proton, one electron and one antineutrino: why? Because at the left >>> of >>> the neutron decay equation you do not have leptons, at the right you have >>> one lepton and this would be against the leptons number conservation law: >>> therefore you have to assume the emission of an antineutrino, so you have >>> one plus lepton ( the electron ), one minus lepton ( the antineutrino ) = >>> zero leptons also at the right of the equation, so that the law is >>> respected. You could say that this sounds a little bit tricky, like an >>> artifact, but…it is, albeit without this trick the Standard Model would >>> brutally crack down: realistically, between a crack and a trick is better >>> the trick. >>> Warm Regards, >>> A.R. >>> >>> >> >> >
