The following reference actually shows the monopole magnetic field produce by the polariton. If you cannot understand that picture, I cannot do more.
The Ni/H reactor produces the same effect using polariton vortexes that form on the surface of nickel micro particles and in clusters of lithium hydride nanoparticles. There is also the condensation of these polariton solitons that provide super-radiance as another powerful amplification mechanism. see figure 2 for a picture of the monopole magnetic beam Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Axil Axil, > > Saying that a plasmon is a quasi particle of plasma oscillation is no more > helpful than saying a phonon is a quantization of mechanical vibration. > As an engineer one cares more about the properties than the detailed > explanation but as a scientist I need something more solid about .how it > works than the above. It seems to me that iti is basically just math with > a name given to something that is not really understood. Maybe that is > just my ignorance. > > Likewise, in the first paper you linked, I have no idea if the field shown > around a nano particle subjected to a laser pulse is real or has been > measured or is a mathematical speculation. Let alone why or how that field > is formed. I have no idea how one could look at what is happening inside > a volume that is below the diffraction limit. > > So, if the papers you link are correct I can understand that your theory > makes sense, but I would like to see more experimental proof of the > fundamentals before accepting it. > > Thanks for your replies and the links. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 10:11 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect > > Nanoparticles produce Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) which are the > optical cavities that produce that magnetic fields that result in meson > emission. Sorry if the line of connections is long, Here is how > nanoparticles produce EMF amplification of light. > > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.1657.pdf > > Plasmonics with a twist: taming optical tornadoes on the nanoscale > > Nanoplasmonics provide many types of EMF amplification mechanisms. One of > the more difficult mechanisms to understand is how a pile of nano and micro > particles greatly amplify EMF. The reference provided in this post shows > how the topology in the way particles aggregate explain how EMF is > concentrated through vortex formation. The reference defines an analogy > between a vortex and a gear. Like a funnel, a large particle gathers the > energy from a wave of EMF far larger than its diameter, In the case of the > Rossi system, this type particle is the 5 micron nickel particle. > > https://vimeo.com/36691535 > > > This large particle produces a relatively huge vortex. Other particles of > various sizes accumulate around the nickel particle. Each of these > particles produce a vortex proportional to the size of the particle. These > vortexes fit together like gears where the large vortex provides a large > amount of power, and the other smaller vortexes provide a gear train that > speeds up the rotation rate of the smaller gears down the train. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkxXheV748U > > Finally, the smallest vortexes associated with hydrogen crystals, spin at > high rates of speed providing large EMF power amplification. > The take away is that a large spread of particles sizes produced within an > aggregation of particles generates the most powerful EMF amplification > effects. This fact explaines why the “secret sauce” effect provides such a > large EMF power amplification result. These alkali metal hydrides supply > the intermediatly sized gears that allows the large nickel gears to > transfer their vast store of energy with little loss to the smallest > hydrogen based gears down a smoothly running vortex power transmission > chain. > I venture to say that there is randomness associated with this particle > aggregation process that enables a sort of natural selection where the > most effective dust pile configurations provide the most EMF > amplification. When there are an abundance of particles, the chances are > good that some of these piles will be LENR capable. That is to say, when > there are a large number of particles, the chances are good that some of > their aggregates will produce EMF amplication great enough to catalyze > nuclear effects. > > There is also a certain lifetime associated with particle formation. > Particle piles are constantly falling apart. These particle aggregates must > be constantly rebuilt to maintain a sustained reaction rate. > > The SunCell is an example of dusty plasma based LENR where silver vapor > condenses into nanoparticles that produce the LERN reaction. > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote: > > Axil Axil, > Thanks for the interesting paper. While it seems clear that small > particles are formed in the vicinity of the gold nano particles, the > mechanism does not appear to be understood. If they are neutrons, as the > authors think, why do you think they originate from the H rather than from > the thorium salt in solution? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Fri, Apr 28, 2017 2:47 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect > > An experiment based on this one that has been already performed as > follows: > > Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au > nanoparticles in > the presence of Thorium aqua-ions > A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev > > https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf > > "The resulting average size of Au NPs as determined by Transmission > Electron Microscopy lies between 10 and 20 nm." > > The addition is to configure this experiment with two double concentric > glass chambers with pure water and gold nanoparticles in the inner chamber > and one with a thorium salt in solution in water filling the outer chamber > but without any nanoparticles inside of it. > > First test the two concentric chambers without nanoparticles added to the > inner chamber. Expect to see no transmutation in either the inner or the > outer chamber. > > Next test the two concentric chambers with nanoparticles added to the > inner chamber. Expect to see transmutation results involving thorium in > the outer chamber as was seen in the referenced experiment done by A.V. > Simakin and G.A. Shafeev. > > This will show that interaction between light and nanoparticles produce > the LENR reaction and that the reaction is carried out at a distance by > subatomic particles that can penetrate a glass wall. > > Variations on the wall material: aluminum, iron, stainless steel, lead etc > can be carried out if the laser beam enters the inner chamber from an open > top of the inner chamber. > > Next, a high voltage spark discharge can replace the laser light that is > fired just above the top of the water level on the inner chamber. As a > probe of the LENR reaction, expect to see transmutation results involving > thorium in the outer chamber. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote: > > Axil Axil, > > Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields is too dense for me by an order of > magnitude. I subscribe to the theory that if one truly understands the > situation they can explain it in relatively simple terms. > > So what would you propose as a demonstration of LENR with a parameter that > could be altered to prove your theory? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 7:29 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect > > IMHO, Holmlid's recent experiments using a fast high electric field to > induce meson production has proved the theory. > > This result shows that the SPP requires an electrostatic field stimulus to > produce the super strong magnetism necessary to activate nucleon decay. > > Also, the use of anisotropic magnets (SmCo5) to induce LENR shows that > magnetism disrupts the gluon condensate inside the proton and neutron. > > Even through there is a difference between a monopole fundamental > particle, a synthetic monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and an > anisotropic magnetic field formatted by a pertinent magnet to support > monopole flux lines, the magnetic field produces the same effect. > > The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field > (almost a monopole formated magnetic field). > > This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force. > > That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. > > To refresh your memory, see > > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html > > The details of what a strong monopole magnetic field does to the insides > of the proton and neutron is yet to be determined. > > I am trying to understand this: See > > http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0906083/pdf/25.pdf > > Lattice QCD in strong magnetic Fields > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote: > > AXil Axil, > > As usual you have come up with a very imaginative theory that sounds just > as likely or unlikely as myriads of others. > My question is how can it be proved or falsified? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Apr 25, 2017 4:29 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Kerr effect > > LENR in a nutshell > > LENR is an optical based process where light is trapped in a waveform > called a soliton. Think of this structure as Nano sized ball lightning. > This ball of light can form in many ways: inside ultra-dense hydrogen, on > the surface of rough metal surfaces, inside cracks in metal, on > nanoparticles and microparticles, between nanoparticles, and in dusty > plasma. But critically, this soliton is not active until it is triggered > through the electrostatic effects of a stimulating emission. > > When this soliton first form, light rotates around inside the soliton and > supports two degenerate propagating-wave modes: clockwise (CW) and > counterclockwise (CCW) waves, manifesting the symmetry of this system. This > counter rotation of the light negates any organization of the spin of the > light from generating any meaningful magnetic effect. > > But when the symmetry of this counter rotating light is broken by this > electrostatic stimulant, like a magnet all spin of the light ceases to > interfere with each other and a newly organized super intense magnetic beam > projects out of the soliton in an highly organized mode. The soliton then > becomes a synthetic analog monopole quasiparticle. > > When this beam of magnetism enters inside protons and neutrons that move > into its path, the quarks that make up these protons and neutrons change > their type(color) and the protons and neutrons transform into exotic mesons > made up of strange and beauty quark types. Energy is also produced in these > subatomic particle decays and is feed back into the solitons of light > thereby increasing their intensity. In this way, this infusion of incoming > subatomic energy allows the soliton to survive for an extended period in a > self-sustaining mode while the electrostatic stimulant continues to > maintain the organization of the photonic spin. > > Leif Holmlid has been using a laser pulse as the stimulator but yesterday > Sveinn Olafsson just told me this: “Leif has applied fast high electric > field and sees meson signal” > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A post that might hold some insights as follows: > > > 1. Giuseppe April 23, 2017 at 3:37 PM > > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=230#comment-1276782> > Dear Andrea, > > seems that to activate the E-Cat you need heat, does the QuarkX need > heat to be activated? > > Best regards, Giuseppe > 2. Andrea Rossi April 23, 2017 at 3:48 PM > > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=230#comment-1276783> > Giuseppe: > > Not exactly. The mechanism is much more complex and is based on > electromagnetic fields. > > Warm Regards, > > A.R. > > ================ > The nature of the LENR reaction has evolved when the gas envelope is in > the plasma state to depend solely on optical mechanisms. An EMF trigger is > the factor can gets the LENR reaction going. not heat. As stated in the > Rossi patent, very high voltage electrostatic potential is that trigger. > The name of the triggering effect is "kerr effect". The minimum voltage at > which the kerr effect is triggered is 30,000 volts. > > This trigger applies to both Rossi's low temperature reactions and his > plasma based reactions. > > Kerr electro-optic effect > The Kerr electro-optic effect, or DC Kerr effect, is the special case in > which a slowly varying external electric field is applied by, for instance, > a voltage <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage> on electrodes across > the sample material. Under this influence, the sample becomes birefringent > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringent>, with different indices of > refraction for light polarized > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_(waves)> parallel to or > perpendicular to the applied field. The difference in index of refraction > is controlled by the strength of the applied electric field. > > > [image: 1-physicistsob.jpg] > Birefringence modifies how light behaves inside a whispering gallery wave. > > Birefringence is the optical <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optics> property > of a material having a refractive index > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index> that depends on the > polarization <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_(waves)> and > propagation direction of light <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light>. > These optically anisotropic <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisotropic> > materials are said to be birefringent (or birefractive). The > birefringence is often quantified as the maximum difference between > refractive indices exhibited by the material. Crystals > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal> with non-cubic crystal structures > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_structure> are often birefringent, > as are plastics <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic> under mechanical > stress <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_stress>. > > The kerr effect produces a change in stated of the optical properties that > underpin the LENR reaction. Research should be directed at finding where > that change of state sets in. > > As in Holmlid's experiments, a laser can produce the kerr effect > > Optical Kerr effect > The optical Kerr effect, or AC Kerr effect is the case in which the > electric field is due to the light itself. This causes a variation in index > of refraction which is proportional to the local irradiance > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irradiance> of the light. This refractive > index variation is responsible for the nonlinear optical > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_optics> effects of self-focusing > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-focusing>, self-phase modulation > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-phase_modulation> and modulational > instability <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulational_instability>, and > is the basis for Kerr-lens modelocking > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr-lens_modelocking>. This effect only > becomes significant with very intense beams such as those from lasers > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser>. The optical Kerr effect has also > been observed to dynamically alter the mode-coupling properties in > multimode fibre, a technique that has potential applications for > all-optical switching mechanisms. > > > > > >
