Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is what I am not getting. Why are we even talking about 'cold fusion' > as a reality, when initial (wild?) success always seems to end up in a > dead-end -- where people can get away with SAYING this sort of thing..? > The results are not a bit dead end. By the standards of experimental science, cold fusion results were superb. Practically unprecedented in the history of science. It was a totally unexpected phenomenon and it is still not understood, yet within a few years there were hundreds of irrefutable papers confirming it. If it were not for academic politics, every scientist on earth would be convinced by the results from people such as Fritz Will. See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/WillFGtritiumgen.pdf People such as Che mistakenly believe it is a dead end because he reads mass media lies instead of scientific papers, and because frauds such as Defkalion and Rossi have lately dominated the field with fake claims. That never happened from 1989 until Rossi came along. He has almost single-handedly destroyed the field. - Jed
