The Ideal shape of the LENR active nanoparticles is the nanowire.
[image: tumblr_inline_nklod0IHqf1rpydpj.gif] (Simulation of the continuous polarization dependence of the photoinduced surface plasmon polaritons field distribution in a silver nanoresonator of 5.7 μm length and 67 nm radius under 800 nm excitation. Details of the the induced |*Ez*| distribution with polarization angle *φ*. The picture shows how Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP) form on the surface of a nanowire. Heat produces a periodic barrier called a quantum or thermal phase slip that confines packets of electrons is a regular pattern whose number is proportional to the temperature. The heat photons combine with the trapped electrons to form polaritons. The hotter it gets, the more vigorous is the productions and the power of the SPP. The pattern of polarization shows that all the SPPs behave in the same way and thus are regimented by Bose Condensation. Under Bose Condensation, all the energy of the polariton condinsate is available to any member of the condinsate, a process called superradiance (AKA...all for one and one for all). On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wouldn't that be fascinating if High Temp Superconductors were > generating linear BECs? I can see they might be Luttinger Liquids, > but let's say it went one step further, not into a solid state of > matter but into the Condensate state of matter. Are there telltale > signs of a BEC? > > On 7/18/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> > wrote: > >> > >> There are no room temperature superconductors. They are theoretically > >> impossible. > >> > >> ***Someone should tell the guys who are working towards that goal. > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room-temperature_superconductor > > > > > > I think the problem with this sort of thinking, is that the assumption is > > to assume we need only be looking at essentially 'known' states of matter > > -- whilst totally overlooking the HUGE (essentially INFINITE) 'phase > space' > > of possibilities which 'emergent' physical relations hand us. > > > > Someone is not 'thinking outside the box'... > > > >
