I didn't accuse Suhas of scamming, although that's a distinct possibility. It looks to me like the lawyers and bankers that have a hold over Suhas might be running a scam and I was urging MFMP to use caution. At the very least, buying real estate is pretty far afield from what MFMP's mission statement projects.
And in the link provided, I'm not the only one saying such things. So pipe down, bub. Argue the facts, not personality "types" and pure bullshit. On 7/20/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> What? You're the one who started with the personal bullshit. >> Buying real estate to help out an experimenter's debt situation is >> pretty far afield from what MFMP's stated mission is declared. >> > > > You *accused* them of scamming. YOU started this, bub. > But I have lots of experience with your type, understand... so don't think > you're going to be able to misdirect anything here. > > > > > > > > >> >> On 7/20/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Occham's Razor applies in scientific politics as well as it applies to >> >> other inductive pursuits. And I'm not the one prevaricating, I'm >> >> trying to get PAST the evasion. Why are you even here with your >> >> attitude? >> >> >> > >> > >> > 'I know you are -- but what am I??' >> > >> > I expect such juvenile games from people who start off poisoning the >> well, >> > like you did. >> > >> > So be it. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> On 7/20/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Kevin O'Malley >> >> > <kevmol...@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Because if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, walks like a >> >> >> duck, etc., it's probably a duck. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > That's the kind of bullshit, status-quo prevarication we get in >> Politix >> >> all >> >> > the time, eh? Shame on you for trying it here. It's not unlike >> >> > kicking >> >> > someone in the head when they're already down: it's too easy, and >> >> > it's >> >> not >> >> > fair play. Why are you even here, with an attitude like that..? >> >> > >> >> > Frankly Bub, this thing is NOT quacking like a duck as far as I can >> >> > see, >> >> > based on a few videos and articles. I'm hoping we're actually seeing >> >> > what >> >> > many of us hope we are seeing. HOW these things always end up >> >> > failing >> >> > in >> >> > the end, is what *I* want to know. The MFMP guy speaks elsewhere of >> >> > 'dark >> >> > forces'... and being the subject of 'dark forces' myself -- I *KNOW* >> >> > they >> >> > really DO exist. So AFAIC: there IS likely a conspiracy to derail >> >> > ALL >> >> cold >> >> > fusion research. >> >> > >> >> > And I wonder who'd be behind THAT effort... >> >> > >> >> > For that matter: who burned down Tesla's lab..? I'll give you three >> >> > guesses. That's all you'd need. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> http://e-catworld.com/2017/07/14/mfmp-plan-and-proposal- >> >> >> regarding-ecco-device/ >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7/20/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Why would anyone think this guy is having the World on, as some >> sort >> >> of >> >> >> > scam..? That sort of thinking is AFAIC simply more ritual abuse >> >> >> > of >> >> >> Occam's >> >> >> > poor razor. Considering the HUGE amount of work AND resources >> people >> >> >> > put >> >> >> > into these sorts of things, *you* people really should be >> >> >> > compelled >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > *give them reasonable benefit of the doubt* -- until 'something >> >> >> > comes >> >> >> > up' >> >> >> > to -- justifiably -- indicate otherwise. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Sheesh. Misanthropists. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >
