Fission in LENR is caused by muons. If Ed Storms would invest in a muon detector, then he would see that this assertion is true.
The Chernobyl disaster was caused in part by an electric explosion in water as the source of added fission induced by muon emissions from the electric exposition. See: On the possible physical mechanism of Chernobyl catastrophe and the unsoundness of official conclusion A.A. Rukhadze,* L.I. Urutskojev,** D.V. Filippov** https://arxiv.org/ftp/nucl-ex/papers/0304/0304024.pdf "Apart from the neutron mechanism, other mechanisms of uranium fission are also known to exist, for example, fission induced by slow muons [24]. . The mechanism of uranium fission under the action of magnetic monopoles has been considered theoretically [25]. It was suggested [25] that the monopole-nuclear interaction is so strong that a monopole that comes close to a nucleus can induce 238U fission." L.I. Urutskojev and D.V. Filippov latter verified this assertion in exploding titanium foil experiments that produced fission in uranium at a distance from the electric arc explosion. As we now know through the work of Ken Shoulders and G. Egely, dusty plasma produces LENR activated nanoparticles and polaritons. The polaritons generate the monopole magnetic field lines that induce muon production. On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:42 AM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > IMHO strong magnetic fields varying at a given resonant frequency (like > in a laser or gaser) have a good chance of causing a metastable isomer that > fissions—gives up potential energy to kinetic energy of two or more new > particles which may be unstable themselves. > > > > This method of radioactive waste management is one of 7 or8 options listed > in the DOE’s EIS for high level waste management at Hanford, issued in the > late 1970’s. It was considered impractical since there was no open (not > dark) laser/gaser technology available to produce the resonant > magnetic/electric fields of *sufficient intensity* to penetrate the > atomic electronic structure. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > > > *From: *Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> > *Sent: *Monday, September 18, 2017 6:35 AM > *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Fission of heavy nuclei under assymetric electron > screening? > > > > Hi Robin, > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:34 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > > > > In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:10:22 -0500: > Hi Eric, > > While the concept is interesting, consider that it won't deliver excess > energy > unless the original isotope is already radioactive. If it is, then you may > have > a way of shortening the half life. How are you contemplating going about > it? > (Plenty of radioactive substances around that many people would be only to > happy > to pay you to take away. ;) > > > > The hope was that if the idea had merit in the case of heavy nuclei that > decay by spontaneous fission, it might also be applicable to heavy nuclei > that are normally stable. One thought about how to trigger the process: a > strong magnetic field will shift the electron orbitals in a preferred > direction; perhaps this will in turn set up a gradient of electron density > along the preferred direction. > > > > Eric > > > > >
