Reference: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.03899
Weyl-Kondo Semimetal in a Heavy Fermion System I did not see where " deuterate palladium ecosystem" is found to be a Weyl-Kondo semimetal. The materials used in the experiments for Weyl-Kondo semimetal were CeRu4Sn6 and Ce3Bi4Pd3. On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > In this new paper the Weyl-Kondo deuterate palladium ecosystem is seen to > provide more than sufficient conditions for COLD FUSION to occur. > http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2017/12/21/ > weyl-kondo-quantum-semimetal-defines-deuterated-palladium/ > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2017 9:56 PM > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion > TimesImprovement In Yield > > > > IMHO, the muons come from hadronization of the energy stored by the > metallic hydrogen. The energy transferred from hadron decay to the metallic > hydrogen accumulates and is eventually converted to mesons. This energy > storage mechanism might be disrupted through the destruction of the > metallic hydrogen in a runtime cycle. Such an energy store release might be > accomplished with the arc discharge to produce a magnetic field strong > enough to release the energy stored by the metallic hydrogen before enough > is accumulated to catalyze meson production. > > > > As another way, a thick blanket of filbe could also convert the muons to > heat. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLiBe > > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:08 PM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > > *From: *Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > > > > - But Holmlid get a high energy reaction from excitation from a very > low powered laser. A petawatt laser is extreme overkill. > > > > > > Yes - but the problem with the Holmlid approach (if we take his claims at > face value) is that the output energy is largely in the form of muons. > > > > There is no obvious way to capture muons efficiently since their decay > will occur far away from the reactor. IOW it is hard to convert that kind > of reaction into a usable form and it may be hard to scale. Perhaps that > detail/problem (conversion) is what Holmlid is working on now. I would love > to see his comments on this paper from Hora. > > > > In contrast, the boron fusion output is mostly energetic alpha particles, > which can be thermalized easily or better yet, converted directly into > electricity. Plus, there is some doubt about the identity of Holmlid’s > copious muons and no replication has been published. > > > > If Holmlid were to modify his device for the proton-boron reaction, he > could change a lot of skepticism into belief since it would be easier to > measure the results, for one thing. > > > > Did you notice the mention of super heavy hydrogen in the Hora paper? That > is most curious given the recent history of Hora and Holmlid working > together. Is Hora referring to UDH? > > > > It may seem that Hora and Holmlid had some kind of falling-out since there > is no mention of the earlier work and tons of references with no credits. > > > > More questions than answers, as of now. > > > > > > > > Here is Holmlid’s patent application -- which is easily amenable to > hydrogen boron fusion > > https://www.google.com/patents/EP2680271A1?cl=en > > Imagine collecting the dense hydrogen on a substrate of boron, which then > becomes the target for a laser pulse – or double pulse. > > Holmlid suggests the dense state can be manufactured and collected as an > independent step. The ideal way to convert it in a second step would seem > to be boron fusion. > > Holmlid would be wise to specifically add boron fusion to his application. > > Obviously if the new kind of “ponderomotive fusion” can be made to work > with normal hydrogen, the dense state should even be better as a starting > point… > > …unless of course the Hora suggestion is indeed making the dense hydrogen > in the first pulse and reacting it in the second pulse. > > In that case, he should have credited Holmlid. > > > > >
