As you won't believe anything short of working reactors on the market, I see no point in continuing this discussion. Rossi has stated he is not going to show anything more of the QX until they are in production and he hopes that will be before the end of 2018.
-----Original Message----- From: JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Mar 10, 2018 4:34 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:1/f squared gamma distribution from Rossi-like Wait a minute – Adrian says he has independent evidence of a factory. This seems at first blush to be irrational if not silly… but heck -- let’s hear or see this evidence ! Hopefully it will not come from Rossi or one of his sock puppets and hopefully there will be a building and assembly line and hopefully it will not be called JM Enterprises but maybe it will be filled with those robots which he promised were coming to Boston back in 2012 for that other factory, the one which was to make the prE-Scat before IH entered the picture. But first – you do not need a factory--- do you !?! Actually Rossi could totally rehabilitate his crappy reputation with any honest and independent showing of a working device. Why build a factory without a product to show ? Doesn’t it make more sense to have a physicist show the product being tested at a local University before you go over to the factory? He likes Sweden and Gothenburg would be an excellent choice for a reliable place with a top level physics department - to test and show it off. From: Brian Ahern There is no factory and less obvious, there is no Santa Claus either. From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2018 3:04 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:1/f squared gamma distribution from Rossi-like I know that you and Brian can't resist bad mouthing Rossi, but there are signs that he has a commercial product with the QX. I have some independent evidence that he has indeed started a factory to produce them and he remains optimistic production will start in 2018. If the QX does perform anywhere near what he claims it is truly insulting to suggest he "stumbled" upon it. -----Original Message----- From: JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Mar 10, 2018 12:58 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:1/f squared gamma distribution from Rossi-like There is plenty of excellent work from other researchers (other than Rossi) on this site. If we accept the reality of LENR we cannot reject Rossi solely because he is a dishonest scam artist. There is even the possibility that Rossi could stumble onto something valid at this juncture (2018) despite the crap he has presented before. From: Brian Ahern The MFMP website is an embarrassment. They still give credence to Andrea Rossi ! Why would you site this site? This is an example of cognitive dissonance.
