http://news.mit.edu/2019/quark-speed-proton-neutron-pairs-0220
Another article about the The EMC effect, but with more detail from MIT. On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 7:50 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Axil, > > Yes, clearly dense hydrogen is necessary, and their IP does not limit the > power going in to lasers. They have made a great effort to avoid reference > to Mills version of dense hydrogen, but there is little doubt that patents > will be contested if there is a commercial success. > > The company Norront Fusion Systems is very well funded and is using laser > irradiation but does not want to broadcast that fact due to the IP which is > already out there, mostly held by National labs in the US. BTW this > company Norront - in Norway, says that they have 3 operating reactors > producing muons, now! For all we know they could be months away from a big > announcement. > > http://www.norrontfusion.com/ > > Holmlid seems to be fond of exaggeration at times and has said several > things he would probably like to take back or clarify, such as the muon > effect happening with fluorescent lighting and other nonsense. This is one > of the reasons that some physicists refuse to even consider the validity of > his experiments. They will get a big surprise soon IMO. > > Now that Holmlid has gone full tilt commercial and has big money involved > - almost nothing said can be believed, except details in the patent which > if false would jeopardize the legal protection. > > > Axil Axil wrote: > > Jones, > > You may be placing too much emphasis on the laser reaction mechanism with > Ultra dense hydrogen here. Holmlid has found that the laser pulse can be > replaced with a spark and that spark can still get the same reactions to > occur as that low powered laser pulse can. The indispensable role that > Ultra dense hydrogen plays in this quark confinement disruption reaction is > to reformat the stimulant EMF energy into the proper strong force > disruption format. >
