Philippe Hatt’s physical model for neucleons (potons and neutrons) and Bill Stubb’s evaluations of old and new high energy scattering experiments valadiating Hatt’s model are pertinent to explaining the disintegration of H into muons. Muons appear to be quasi stable constitutents of nucleons when existing outside the a nucleon’s coherent system of primary particldes—electrons, positrons and neutrinos.
“Hidden in plain sight… as it were.” Jones assessment is right on IMHO. The role of neutrinos in a complete nucleon is not addressed by Hatt’s model noted above, but may be pertinent in understanding nucleon stability when irradiated by a laser such as used by Holmlid in his experiments. Bob Cook ----------------------------- ________________________________ From: JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 11:19:47 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:A backdoor to proton annihilation? One of the big knocks about the Holmlid effect – where the claim is that hydrogen is completely annihilated- showing up primarily as muons, which then decay (but can catalyze fusion before decay) is the low input energy used by Holmlid. This annihilation process is well known in beamlines at the big labs and normally requires a massive amount of energy to smash protons into “quark soup”… Because of the disparity in applied energy – many experts think Holmlid is delusional. But wait…the problem here could be that the critics’ only tool is the beamline and the geniuses have not carefully looked elsewhere. In fact, there could be another way to approach annihilation – the antineutron. But where would they coming from? Hidden in plain sight… as it were. The following research confirms the theory that the antiproton is the exact mirror image of the proton. There is absolutely no difference other than the charge has been flipped. This is important for an alterative understanding of annihilation. “Protons and antiprotons appear to be true mirror images” https://phys.org/news/2015-08-protons-antiprotons-true-mirror-images.html Thus the question is this: can coherent photons of the correct energy and resonance flip a proton into an antiproton by simply reversing the charge? Clearly the answer implies a backdoor to proton annihilation if Holmlid is correct. Charge conjugation is a transformation that switches particles with their corresponding antiparticles, and it is well studied as C-symmetry. Sooner or later if the Holmlid effect continues to be validated as Norront has done, the experts will realize that proton annihilation is simply the surprising result of charge-flipping following laser irradiation … AT LOW ENERGY …and massive input from a proton beam is not required. The critics may end looking like fools unless they jump onboard the Holmlid express, which is leaving the station soon. Next stop – Stockholm.
