Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: Take a look at the "Acknowledgements" in the cited paper. > > There are two JASONs who contributed in some way. >
Ah, yes. I see what you mean. They were unhelpful. Ed described their contributions in his lecture. Garwin did what he always does, which is to look for a reason to dismiss the claims. He came up with a hypothesis which would only apply at a much higher temperature and which, if it did apply, would cause the heat to be underestimated, not overestimated. I do not recall the details but I think I reported them here.
