Hi Jones
Yes! The 4-He spin pairing energy can be directly derived from the SO(4)
electro-weak potential force. Also the missing correction of the
Hydrogen (p-e) ionization energy can be given by the very same force and
the SO(4) orbits. If you did follow the SO(4) physics, then you can see
that with SO(4) orbits you get all known 10 digits of the ionization
energy. (Deuterium too!)
In the last year I found 3 different ways to model the nuclear energies
(mass). First standards constants based, second magnetic mass based,
third: coupled orbit based (includes second model). The last model gives
the exact masses & "magnetic mass" structure for neutron, deuterium, 4-He.
My focus on theory is currently very low. I'm doing LENR experimental
support and I'm "glad" to see that the new model(s) works as expected.
As soon as others catch up (understand) with SO(4) physics I will start
to model again. The SO(4) model is safe enough as it exactly explains
the gravitation constant without any work around and fitting just using
basics SO(4) physics quantities, that were derived long before the
formula has been found...
If you understand the SO(4) based nature of gravitation you will start
to like the new model! All mass is spin-base!
Jürg
Am 04.05.2019 um 00:48 schrieb Jones Beene:
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> In contrast to QM SO(4) physics gives the exact relation of
forces/energies of spin-paired electrons, what is the first step of
condensation of matter below Bohr radius.
Hi,
If you have a minute - what is the exact relation that you mention? Is
there a known binding energy for spin-paired electrons that is
supported by this theory ?
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18