Bob,...
Such models - as strings - that start and stop at a single monopole are
obvious nonsense as per definition a monopole can only have starting
points or termination points but not both independent of how small you
make it. Otherwise you have to invent two different types of unconnected
monopoles.. and yes what about the EM energy of the field will it just
once "fly" from one monopole to the other??
Here a vibrating string is not allowed as a solution as it violates the
monopole assumption...as the monopoles only can be connected if they
exchange energy!! What leads to a one time pulsed monopole only!
Please also show the physics that inside the monopole generates the
classic magnetic field? An EM field contains energy! How is it produced
inside the monopole??
*I**see an other problem*. Does isolated charge really exist??
The latest modeling did show that at least in a nucleus charge is a
topological effect and depends on rotating mass. This is what we learn
from experiments that are conform with 1FC "spin-pairing like" orbits.
Thus the electron seems to be the only true charge (in our physics
model) as it has no defined EM mass radius.
But here too I do believe that we can find a classic model that shows
how charge is generate by nested EM flux.
Thus the other way round (no real charge) seems to be much more promising.
J.W.
Am 09.08.19 um 22:42 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:
Andrew, Jones etal,--
The magnetic Aharonov–Bohm effect is also closely related to Dirac's
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Dirac> argument that the existence
of a magnetic monopole
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole> can be accommodated
by the existing magnetic source-free Maxwell's equations
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations> if both electric
and magnetic charges are quantized.
A magnetic monopole implies a mathematical singularity in the vector
potential, which can be expressed as a Dirac string
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_string> of infinitesimal diameter
that contains the equivalent of all of the 4π/g/ flux from a monopole
"charge" /g/. The Dirac string starts from, and terminates on, a
magnetic monopole. Thus, assuming the absence of an infinite-range
scattering effect by this arbitrary choice of singularity, the
requirement of single-valued wave functions (as above) necessitates
charge-quantization. That is, 2 q e q m ℏ c {\displaystyle 2{\frac
{q_{\text{e}}q_{\text{m}}}{\hbar c}}} 2{\frac
{q_{{\text{e}}}q_{{\text{m}}}}{\hbar c}}must be an integer (in cgs
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_units> units) for any electric
charge /q/_e and magnetic charge /q/_m .
Like the electromagnetic potential
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_potential> *A* the
Dirac string is not gauge invariant (it moves around with fixed
endpoints under a gauge transformation) and so is also not directly
measurable.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net>
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 7, 2019 5:17:54 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject:* RE: [Vo]:FW: coherent system energy states
Andrew, Bob
A good paper on this subject (longitudinal waves) is
“Unravelling the potentials puzzle and corresponding case for the
scalar longitudinal electrodynamic wave”
Donald Reed 2019 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1251 012043
Reed does not make the scalar to neutrino connection, which seems to
serve the same purposes, which is to explore the line between what is
real and what seems real because it balances equations.
The best thing one can say about QM is that it lends physical
credulity to an imaginary world… but then again, what is real?
*From: *Andrew Meulenberg <mailto:mules...@gmail.com>
**
*….* At the short distance of deep-orbits from the nucleus, the
neutrino (considered to be similar to photons) would be in the
"longitudinal photon" mode
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
