Jurg—

  1.  Do you consider, per SO(4) physics, that the “spinning EM mass is what is 
called a magnetic dipole force in classical physics?


  1.  Are the 1FC  and 2FC force constants derivable from SO(4) physics?  (The 
use of the term “virtual charge” to describe these constants seems to suggest 
they are “fudge factors” themselves.)


Bob Cook

From: Jürg Wyttenbach<mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 2:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on gravity control experiment

Gravity is mediated by the electron perturbative mass.

The "gravity constant" can be exactly calculated from SO(4) physics form 
factors that are: The 4D dense mass radius, the Bohr radius, electron mass, 
proton mass, electron g-factor. The Bohr radius is the location of the 
"electron perturbative mass" (green part of formula) that mediates the force. 
No fudge factors are needed....


G = mec2*(1-1/eg2)(rp4D3/a02 )*1FC'5/(2FC*mp)2

1FC is the weak force constant 2FC the electro strong force constant.  1FC'5 is 
the rest force proportional to any atom spinning in the world that couples to 
any other atom over the electrons. The power of 5 in 1FC'5  is caused by the 
virtual charge that holds all magnetic force together as soon as it deviates 
from the ideal Clifford torus orbit.

>From this you immediately see that gravitation is an EM force and caused by 
>spinning EM mass.

For shielding gravitation you must manipulate the electron perturbative mass, 
what is not as easy as people believe...

J.W.


Am 02.01.20 um 21:19 schrieb 
bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>:
Gravity waves appear to travel at c associated with the velocity of
EM waves.  Thus the parameters of space that influence the EM waves would also 
appear to be operative in the same way for gravity as a reasonable assumption.

Recent gravity shield/thrust generation devices seem to be based on controlled 
magnetic fields.

A recent technical paper from a Group in Romania suggests that gravity is the 
combined effect  of magnetic dipole fields at a distance (and close up as 
well.)  The magnetic dipoles of nucleons and all isotopes when considered in 
mass looks like gravity at a distance.  The sum of all magnetic dipoles that 
make up matter of a given mass (those of positrons, neutrinos and electrons to 
identify known primary particle) are the magnetic dipoles to consider in a 
“gravitating” mass.

Screening a local magnetic dipole field may allow demonstration of the loss of 
“gravitation” between two laboratory masses that would otherwise be attracted, 
but are not so attracted because of the magnetic field shield.

Bob Cook

n



Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Jacob Helvey<mailto:frontiergrav...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2019 2:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on gravity control experiment

I'm currently trying to conduct an experiment in-line with Frank Znidarsic's 
work in hopes to observe some anomalous gravitational behavior.

It seems this group has some insight into this area of research. I would very 
much appreciate some feedback regarding the link below and would be happy to 
answer any questions regarding my approach.

Jake

https://www.frontiergravity.com/active-projects/




--

Jürg Wyttenbach

Bifangstr.22

8910 Affoltern a.A.

044 760 14 18

079 246 36 06

Reply via email to