Jurg,

I'm sorry that I do not have the time to look at your model (nor perhaps do
I even have the math capability). However, your mention of the "electron
perturbative mass" rang a bell. I look at the situation from a physical
view-point.

Every s-orbital atomic electron transits its nuclear region and is
relativistic during that time. During that time, its EM-field energy grows
greatly and alters its "shape". As such, it distorts space and alters the
electron's effective mass (and gravitational attraction). However, in that
process, it takes energy from the nucleus, which may be >95% relativistic
mass itself. Thus, while there is no net change in the energy of an atom,
there may be a change in the net-mass component.

This may be reflected in your equation below. (I hope to be able to look at
it more closely at some point.) You see that "gravitation is an EM *force*".
I would phrase it slightly differently. I would say that gravitation is an
EM *effect*, being associated with the *difference* between the
relativistic EM-field energies when different velocities are considered in
combination (e.g., those of the electron and of the nuclear components).
Without proof, I would attribute the differences to the non-linearity of
gamma. For a lepton, free in space, the difference would be between its net
velocity and the internal velocity associated with its spin component.

Andrew
_ _ _

On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 5:20 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote:

> Gravity is mediated by the electron perturbative mass.
>
> The "gravity constant" can be exactly calculated from SO(4) physics form
> factors that are: The 4D dense mass radius, the Bohr radius, electron mass,
> proton mass, electron g-factor. The Bohr radius is the location of the
> "electron perturbative mass" (green part of formula) that mediates the
> force. No fudge factors are needed....
>
> G = *m**e**c**2***(1-1/e**g**2**)*(rp4D3/a02 )*1FC'5/(2FC*mp)2
>
> 1FC is the weak force constant 2FC the electro strong force constant.
> 1FC'5 is the rest force proportional to any atom spinning in the world
> that couples to any other atom over the electrons. The power of 5 in 1FC'5
> is caused by the the virtual charge that holds all magnetic force together
> as soon as it deviates from the ideal Clifford torus orbit.
>
> From this you immediately see that gravitation is an EM force and caused
> by spinning EM mass.
>
> For shielding gravitation you must manipulate the electron perturbative
> mass, what is not as easy as people believe...
>
> J.W.
>
>
> Am 02.01.20 um 21:19 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:
>
> Gravity waves appear to travel at c associated with the velocity of
>
> EM waves.  Thus the parameters of space that influence the EM waves would
> also appear to be operative in the same way for gravity as a reasonable
> assumption.
>
>
>
> Recent gravity shield/thrust generation devices seem to be based on
> controlled magnetic fields.
>
>
> A recent technical paper from a Group in Romania suggests that gravity is
> the combined effect  of magnetic dipole fields at a distance (and close up
> as well.)  The magnetic dipoles of nucleons and all isotopes when
> considered in mass looks like gravity at a distance.  The sum of all
> magnetic dipoles that make up matter of a given mass (those of positrons,
> neutrinos and electrons to identify known primary particle) are the
> magnetic dipoles to consider in a “gravitating” mass.
>
>
>
> Screening a local magnetic dipole field may allow demonstration of the
> loss of “gravitation” between two laboratory masses that would otherwise be
> attracted, but are not so attracted because of the magnetic field shield.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
> n
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
> *From: *Jacob Helvey <frontiergrav...@gmail.com>
> *Sent: *Saturday, December 28, 2019 2:43 PM
> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject: *[Vo]:Looking for feedback on gravity control experiment
>
>
>
> I'm currently trying to conduct an experiment in-line with Frank
> Znidarsic's work in hopes to observe some anomalous gravitational behavior.
>
>
>
> It seems this group has some insight into this area of research. I would
> very much appreciate some feedback regarding the link below and would be
> happy to answer any questions regarding my approach.
>
>
>
> Jake
>
>
>
> https://www.frontiergravity.com/active-projects/
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jürg Wyttenbach
> Bifangstr.22
> 8910 Affoltern a.A.
> 044 760 14 18
> 079 246 36 06
>
>

Reply via email to