Just to remind you that any calculations that are not able to reproduce
the gravity force or the Maxwell interactions have to be correctly
titled as speculations.
example::
http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/html/10.11648.j.ajmp.20150403.11.html
SO(4) physics shows how the exact gravity force is generated and
explains how it interacts between 2 protons at any distance. It is
obvious from the model that gravitation is not a constant and stars with
different nuclear composition show a tiny +/- deviation in "their
gravitation constant" as the mediating coulomb clouds always have a
slightly different weight.
We need no corrections to the Coulomb law as the error in the potential
driven interactions is due to magnetic interactions. But fudging has
made its way up to NIST and thus it seems now to be an accepted
standard. SM and fudging seem to be twins...
J.W.
Am 08.02.20 um 22:00 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:
Ron—
One additional idea about the microwave weight reduction test:
Since the loss of weight continues after the microwave is turned off,
it would make sense to remove the magnet/aluminum plate from the
machine to a nearby scale, shielded from the microwave, and see if the
weight changes like happened in the machine after turning it off.
If the effect of weight reduction results from the loss of a
consistent (homogeneous) nuclear magnetic dipole orientation)
may be expected given the mass of the combined magnetic nuclear
magnetic dipole field created by the assembly of the earth’s magnetic
dipoles.
I consider even random oriented magnetic dipoles produce a weak
magnetic field that is similar in magnitude with a gravitational
attraction at a distance above about 60 meters between the centers of
two separate masses of magnetic dipoles.
This consideration is based on analyses accomplished by several
Romanian physicists over the last couple decades.
http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/html/10.11648.j.ajmp.20150403.11.html
A similar analysis would apply to magnetic dipole fields at a distance
as addressed for electric fields in the item identified above IMHO, if
electric and magnetic fields fall off at about 1/rxr
with distance from their source. Sections 7 and 8 of the linked item
above address this issue.
(I remember another paper from Romania that looks specifically at the
magnetic dipole and quadrupole analysis for nuclear parameters and
potential explanation of gravitational forces as EM forces. (I lost
reference to that paper in the cloud MS storage I think…maybe someone
knows this lost paper and can identify a current source. )
Bob Cook
*From: *bobcook39...@hotmail.com <mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>
*Sent: *Saturday, February 8, 2020 10:49 AM
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *RE: [Vo]:Fwd: Posible confirmation-Dr Fred
Alzofon-ex-Boeing-Antigravity Paper 81-1608
Ron—I could not understand the setup well enough to address the
questions the apparent results raise. –
* Was the Al plate between the permanent magnets rotated inside the
microwave machine?
* What did the entire assembly with the microwave machine before and
after the experiment weigh?
* Did the action of the microwave machine influence the scale
electronics, causing it to change its output?
* Was there a control run to check on the effect of the microwave on
the scale without the aluminum plate?
* Was the aluminum replaced with a different plastic plate and
tested to confirm no expected weight changes, if any, (per
theory) as a control?
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10
*From: *Ron Kita <mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com>
*Sent: *Monday, January 13, 2020 7:54 AM
*Subject: *[Vo]:Fwd: Posible confirmation-Dr Fred
Alzofon-ex-Boeing-Antigravity Paper 81-1608
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:57 AM ron kita <tekcor...@yahoo.com
<mailto:tekcor...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Greeting Bill et al,
A cheap was well as interesting experiment on the late Dr Alzofon
s AIAA 81-1608 Antigravity paper-
seems to follow his teachings.
18 minites...highly interesting -IMHO. Comments are most
welcomed. I visited the page 9 months ago according to the repiles.
Ad astra,
Ron..Chiralex
Weight Loss in Aluminum? Gravity Control? Part 1
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkI2ebnpnvw>
Weight Loss in Aluminum? Gravity Control? Part 1
Sadly, this technology seems to be completely ignored by
establishment science. Developed by a respected physici...
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
