>>This consideration is based on analyses accomplished by several Romanian
>>physicists over the last couple decades. A Theoretical Confirmation of the
>>Gravitation New Origin Having a Dipolar Electrical Nature with Coulomb Law
>>Corrected
A Theoretical Confirmation of the Gravitation New Origin Having a Dipola...
Ioan Has
The paper starts by analyzing the actual justification of the separation
existing between electrical and gravita...
I met Ioan Has, put his talk on at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWBj1Ed4Mt4&feature=youtu.be
Theoretical confirmation of the gravitation new origin having a special
electrical nature with Coulomb law corrected- Ioan Has talk at Physics
Conference in Brussels 2017 Note: Boscovich's theory See paper at: American
Journal of Modern Physics Volume 4, Issue 3, May 2015, Pages: 97-108
http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/html/10.11648.j.ajmp.20150403.11.html
i.e. its Boscovich's theory
according to Dr Chung Y Lo weight of object is reduced when heated
put his talk on at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPw3xK-9tVQ
I checked Einstein - he was mistranslated - that disguises he was working from
Boscovich theory
On Saturday, 8 February 2020, 22:25:22 GMT, Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch>
wrote:
Just to remind you that any calculations that are not able to reproduce the
gravity force or the Maxwell interactions have to be correctly titled as
speculations.
example::
http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/html/10.11648.j.ajmp.20150403.11.html
SO(4) physics shows how the exact gravity force is generated and explains how
it interacts between 2 protons at any distance. It is obvious from the model
that gravitation is not a constant and stars with different nuclear composition
show a tiny +/- deviation in "their gravitation constant" as the mediating
coulomb clouds always have a slightly different weight.
We need no corrections to the Coulomb law as the error in the potential driven
interactions is due to magnetic interactions. But fudging has made its way up
to NIST and thus it seems now to be an accepted standard. SM and fudging seem
to be twins...
J.W.
Am 08.02.20 um 22:00 schrieb bobcook39...@hotmail.com:
>
Ron—
One additional idea about the microwave weight reduction test:
Since the loss of weight continues after the microwave is turned off, it would
make sense to remove the magnet/aluminum plate from the machine to a nearby
scale, shielded from the microwave, and see if the weight changes like happened
in the machine after turning it off.
If the effect of weight reduction results from the loss of a consistent
(homogeneous) nuclear magnetic dipole orientation)
may be expected given the mass of the combined magnetic nuclear magnetic dipole
field created by the assembly of the earth’s magnetic dipoles.
I consider even random oriented magnetic dipoles produce a weak magnetic field
that is similar in magnitude with a gravitational attraction at a distance
above about 60 meters between the centers of two separate masses of magnetic
dipoles.
This consideration is based on analyses accomplished by several Romanian
physicists over the last couple decades.
http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/html/10.11648.j.ajmp.20150403.11.html
A similar analysis would apply to magnetic dipole fields at a distance as
addressed for electric fields in the item identified above IMHO, if electric
and magnetic fields fall off at about 1/rxr
with distance from their source. Sections 7 and 8 of the linked item above
address this issue.
(I remember another paper from Romania that looks specifically at the magnetic
dipole and quadrupole analysis for nuclear parameters and potential explanation
of gravitational forces as EM forces. (I lost reference to that paper in the
cloud MS storage I think…maybe someone knows this lost paper and can identify a
current source. )
Bob Cook
From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 10:49 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Fwd: Posible confirmation-Dr Fred
Alzofon-ex-Boeing-Antigravity Paper 81-1608
Ron—I could not understand the setup well enough to address the questions the
apparent results raise. –
* Was the Al plate between the permanent magnets rotated inside the
microwave machine?
* What did the entire assembly with the microwave machine before and after
the experiment weigh?
* Did the action of the microwave machine influence the scale electronics,
causing it to change its output?
* Was there a control run to check on the effect of the microwave on the
scale without the aluminum plate?
* Was the aluminum replaced with a different plastic plate and tested to
confirm no expected weight changes, if any, (per theory) as a control?
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Ron Kita
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 7:54 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Fwd: Posible confirmation-Dr Fred Alzofon-ex-Boeing-Antigravity
Paper 81-1608
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:57 AM ron kita <tekcor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Greeting Bill et al,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A cheap was well as interesting experiment on the late Dr Alzofon s AIAA
> 81-1608 Antigravity paper-
>
>
>
> seems to follow his teachings.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 18 minites...highly interesting -IMHO. Comments are most welcomed. I visited
> the page 9 months ago according to the repiles.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ad astra,
>
>
>
> Ron..Chiralex
>
>
>
> Weight Loss in Aluminum? Gravity Control? Part 1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Weight Loss in Aluminum? Gravity Control? Part 1
>
> Sadly, this technology seems to be completely ignored by establishment
> science. Developed by a respected physici...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
