Last month, with little fanfare or press coverage, BLP released some of its more impressive claims ever. The PDF is here: https://brilliantlightpower.com/presentations/Analytical_Presentation.pdf It is a large file - over 100 pages with images - but of course much of the technology has already been dropped or altered, perhaps for the latest round of investor funding. Sadly, however, one finding may benefit others in the World - more than the USA is willing to admit, and for an almost hidden reason. The experiment in question could prove the Mills theory beyond doubt ... to the Pentagon, at least. On page 10 of the citation above, Mills presents a double surprise - in that it was first published in China !
Here is that cite: R. Mills, Y. Lu, R. Frazer, “Power Determination and Hydrino Product Characterization of Ultralow Field Ignition of Hydrated Silver Shots”, Chinese Journal of Physics, Vol. 56, (2018), pp1667-1717. BLP essentially (and naively) appears to shows anyone who is interested the early stages of how to produce a "hydrino bomb" using a silver catalyst. Of course on first look, such a weapon is not nearly as devastating as your typical atomic fission bomb (by many orders of magnitude). Presumably that fact makes the weaponization of hydinos a negligible risk. However, the shockwave is another matter since it is said to be a factor of 10X more energy dense than chemical. QUOTE: "Based on the shockwave propagation velocity and the corresponding pressure, the high-current ignition of water in a silver matrix was measured to produce a shock wave that was equivalent to about 10 times more moles of gunpowder. What is glossed over is that an explosive of only a factor if 10 more energy than chemical energy can produce a nuclear fusion reaction - and without the need for fissile material. This has been arguably proved already and is called the "fourth generation" of atomic weapons. Top secret. The bottom line is that spherical convergence is a "shockwave multiplier." The pure fusion weapon (see Wiki) does not require a fissile "primary" to ignite deuterium - only converging shockwaves. Thus the easiest way to control proliferation (by fissile inventory) becomes worthless. That makes any ultra high energy chemical explosive - like the Mills' silver bullet hydrino bomb - potentially horrendous. As for the near future, we can ask - is it coincidental that Mills has shifted gears and now does not promote silver as a catalyst? Nor does he ever mention the bomb. Is that in response to high level directives? Well, the good news is that Mills has been so wrong, so often in the past 30 years, that the hydrino bomb is likely to be only so much hot air. Where is Inspector Clouseau when we need him?
