In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 27 Feb 2021 00:28:36 +0100: Hi Jürg,
Next question. Can a "fat photon" bind to a proton resonance? IOW are you sure the "fat photon" loses it's identity/internal structure when bound in an atom? >What is a free electron, i.e. as used in an x-ray tube? > >Good question! > >Live - all the chemistry that forms/carries it - happens between the >electron and the proton (inside nuclei). So we stay in between. > >Physically a free electron behaves like a fat photon with a locked in >wave that is responsible for its internal charge coupling - hence mass. > >As in general relativity you can always find math to explain it >differently, but this will not change the three only observable of an >electron. It's mass, magnetic moment and the electron g-factor. Charge >is an attribute=axiom. But all factors are connected and not fully >independent. > >But if an electron can be free is questionable as everywhere, there is >mass and most mass has a magnetic moment, hence there will be interaction. > >J.W. > >On 26.02.2021 21:41, Robin wrote: >> In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:05:31 +0100: >> Hi, >> [snip] >>> No the electron has no stable strong force radius. >>> >>> You can only measure the electron g-factor, where as you can get it from >>> a metric transformation from the proton strong force equation. >>> >>> Physics will change. More radically as some will like. >>> >>> J.W. >> What is a free electron, i.e. as used in an x-ray tube? >>
