Yes - The lack of clarity about what is being produced does not inspire
confidence for the Norront investors.
However, in that confused situation - if the annihilation particles are actual,
whatever they are, and do indeed catalyze deuterium fusion, as they claim --
then we are still on the cusp of a new age of cheap energy, and ITER is an
unneeded waste of resources.
But also the possibility that potassium is overlooked as a reactant - and could
be utilized for a simpler form of energy is still very intriguing, no matter
what else happens.
Axil Axil wrote:
Did you see this video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZHVG5NYLyQ
Holmlid's replicators cannot identify the particles that Holmlid claims to be
seeing. Also. the particles that show up in the cloud chamber happen to be
strange radiation.
Jones Beene wrote:
This chart could lead to an interesting experiment - see Fig 4 of the paper
below, which relates to the desorption energy of K at a graphite surface.
Imagine a few drops of water on a graphite plate -- H2O containing dissolved
KCl -- and irradiated in an oven. Sparks may fly as water is split and
recombined.
Would low energy microwaves be converted into ionizing UV ?
Perhaps - according to the new paper by Holmlid
