Hi Frank and Jones! And the Vortex People at large,
What search keys could help illuminate the right way toward
*nucleoson*ic harmony, Frank and Jones, et al?
Is there yet a plausibility that the right profile of magnetic impulse
will jiggle the *nucleon *in spite of peer review?
Is there yet thought to be a /*nucleoson*/? A phonon on the medium of
the dielectric tension of the Coulomb field.
Is superconduction needed for the *nucleoson *to give a care about
what's above the electron shell? (Electrons Cooper-pair. I hope
Podkletnov is correct.)
Is it righteous or heretical to use the Newton corpuscle thing?
*Sanity checks: **
*
Are my grammar semantics working?
Q: Will a Smith tensor beam coil, establishing a resonance with the
tempic fabric of reality, attract black helicopters? (If not them, then
FCC suites with court summons?)
Q: Is motional magnetics as simple as A.C. current through a toroidal
winding, which has no external magnetic polarity, but does have external
flux? When the current winding current increases, the flux density
increases outside the donut, but yet no polarity showing. Obviously,
toroidal transformers work.
Q: Or is two A.C. electromagnets opposing modulating the flux-density
between them doing the 'motional' thing?
I want to read-up on Hooper motional magnetics soon, but would like to
have a more modern explanation first.
What's Hooper about, guys and gals?
Thank you. Answers to this message are important to your resident poet.
DonEM
On 9/27/2021 11:48 PM, Frank Znidarsic wrote:
Thank you Don. If you check the vortex achieves you will find that my
work is nothing compared to that of Jones B. Here is what others have
said about it.
https://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapterg.html
What I am saying is is that inertial mass is not a conserved property
of the universe. It can be reduced to zero and then we could go
faster than light speed, maybe.
Frank Znidarsic
