Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end down.
This suggests one of 2 things, they either made a ferromagnetic material not a superconductor. OR, they made a superconductor that is only superconductive at one end. So a tiny bit of contamination only occurred at that point? Maybe the thin film technique works better because it increases chances for contamination? On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 08:58, Robin <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> wrote: > In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:13:33 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >Two down > > > >https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/lk-99-room-temperature-superconductor/ > > ...maybe the impurities are what it's all about. Clearly the substance > they produced behaved remarkably like a > superconductor. Perhaps it just needs a bit more study to determine what > the real superconductor is? > Buy electric cars and recharge them from solar panels on your roof. > >
