It's Back...LK-99 second chance? Silicon? https://www.tomshardware.com/news/lk-99-patent-update-suggest-it-could-work
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 11:25 AM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > And a new candidate with "dancing" Cooper pairs. > > > https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-identify-a-strange-new-form-of-superconductivity > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 8:31 PM Jonathan Berry < > jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end >> down. >> >> This suggests one of 2 things, they either made a ferromagnetic material >> not a superconductor. >> >> OR, they made a superconductor that is only superconductive at one end. >> >> So a tiny bit of contamination only occurred at that point? >> >> Maybe the thin film technique works better because it increases chances >> for contamination? >> >> On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 at 08:58, Robin <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> >> wrote: >> >>> In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:13:33 -0400: >>> Hi, >>> [snip] >>> >Two down >>> > >>> > >>> https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/lk-99-room-temperature-superconductor/ >>> >>> ...maybe the impurities are what it's all about. Clearly the substance >>> they produced behaved remarkably like a >>> superconductor. Perhaps it just needs a bit more study to determine what >>> the real superconductor is? >>> Buy electric cars and recharge them from solar panels on your roof. >>> >>>
