As I was eating some soup (on day 5 of the fasting mimicking diet) I wondered why I didn't try putting a pyramid in a box?!
I took a Pyramid I made from A4 Paper where I printed a Template for a Pyramid of my own design, this design uses an effect I discovered and then found another researcher independently discovered! Both of us make the exact same claim, you take a Pyramid, cut it into 4 parts and the further apart you pull the sides (within reason) the stronger the energy (dramatically so) So this pyramid that one lady I sent the design to said "it fills the room with energy". I put in a cardboard box, not even square and guess what, I couldn't feel the energy from it, hmmm. Luckily because it is in 4 segments pulled apart (each being one wall of a 4 sided pyramid, not touching the other walls) there is a lot of space in the middle. So I put some rock salt within the Pyramid in the box and closed it up, waited a few moments and took the Pyramid out, poured the rock salt on to the bench. Then I took more rock salt and repeated the process without putting it in the box. Then I compared the energy I could feel radiation off of each one, and the difference is huge. I also checked out the structure of Copper Titanium Oxide (CCTO) which has value of about 10000. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138589472030317X And it is has the same essential structure. If anyone wants to spend some time making the paper pyramid, has a printer, paper, sellotape and some scissors and 20-30 mins to do what amount to a childs exercise I'll send you 2 templates for 2 designs, they are also great stacked. On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 14:18, Jonathan Berry <jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, just curious about things with a high dielectric constant as these > have been correlated with both Free Energy (a researcher with a coil around > a Barium Titanate coil inputting a special frequency got a blue glow and > free energy out, yes, Barium again pops up). > > But also I recall reading about highly dielectric sands and powders being > found to have some reduced rate of fall in a vacuum or did they demonstrate > a degree of antigravity, I forget. Perhaps both. > > Maybe it was even a connection to T.T Brown's work, but at any rate the > interesting thing is that Barium Titanate which has a dielectric constant > of 1200! Just so happens to be microscopically form a double terminated > pyramid trapped inside a cube. > > Now I have a REALLY REALLY high degree of surface level conviction/hunch > that this high dielectric constant is actually in part an aetheric > property! That it has made denser aetheric energy within itself. > > That those structures if made macroscopically and nested would create some > degree of increase in the dielectric constant of the whole even if made of > materials that have a value nearer 1, Though perhaps the other features > might be needed such as the atomic numbers, I have found that certain > numbers manifest a lot of aetheric energy when surrounded by a number of > "edged" that relate to that number in some way. > > Jonathan > > On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 12:45, Jonathan Berry <jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have presented this to some degree here years ago but time for another >> crack at it. >> When I was in bed this morning I thought of this list, actually in that >> state I was able to think, I believe of a few extra cases that currently I >> can't put my finger on, they would belong in the middle of the list. >> >> Anyway if we were to ask if there is the possibility of some type of >> phenomena in space that might be induced to move, there is a LOT of "stuff" >> in space that conventional science recognizes. >> From frame dragging, Dirac space, Virtual particles/Quantum field theory, >> relic neutrino flux, Dark matter/Energy and much more: >> https://vimeo.com/22956103 >> Indeed the Lamb shift is a separation of virtual particles by an electric >> field that causes the orbital of the Hydrogen atom to split into two very >> close levels. >> >> The first is the ARV (Alien Reproduction Vehicle) known as the fluxliner >> and a very compelling case is made for it in this humorous and effective >> video: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUFYnVXbLoY >> >> There you will see that MANY people claimed to see this same hovering >> saucer at an Air-Show for top brass only. >> >> The startling thing about the design is that the craft had an array of 48 >> high voltage capacitors that looks like a maximized version of the next >> one, this very own lists "Capwarp"! >> http://amasci.com/caps/capwarp.html >> >> There we see a number of people managed to successfully replicate this >> thing, and I recall a number of additional people on this list claiming >> some success that wasn't recorded there. >> >> So, given the Lamb shift and other information letting us know there is >> something to be affected (including by an electric field) and the multiple >> witnesses to the ARV and multiple claimants we could come to the conclusion >> that there is a VERY HIGH probability that a circular array of HV >> capacitors can create levitation. >> >> We also of course have the work of Thomas Townsend Brown, now some of his >> capacitor arrays were indeed very similar to this, though his thrusts were >> stronger he had large numbers of layers submerged in oil and both a weight >> loss and thrust was noticed, this is in addition to the more showy but >> arguably potentially more ion wind based examples he later worked on. >> >> But there is a book, I think it might be the Yellow cover of "Antigravity >> and the World Grid" where it mentions a rumor that T.T Brown was rumored to >> have got far higher levels of Antigravity from a circular array of >> capacitors. >> >> But we aren't done yet! >> >> In an "Infolio" I got from Rex Research it mentioned a high school kid >> who made a large circular capacitor with a Polystyrene dielectric, it lost >> weight no when charged no matter which polarity was up, this aligns with >> T-T Brown claiming that there was both an antigravity AND a propulsive >> component to his work. >> >> Then one day I found a comment on Youtube, it was about a University >> student (Doyle a few years on?) who got levitation from a glass dielectric >> based circular capacitor! >> >> When I relayed this to (RIP) Marc McCandlish he told me about another man >> who made a very very large circular capacitor and he used a black >> dielectric similar to what is used for shoes, and energized it with a Tesla >> coil, if his claims are genuine he made a craft he flew in! >> >> Ok so we have some other interesting evidence to consider. >> There is a claim of another science fair experiment at a school, whis one >> involved 2 circular plates of Aluminium with a time varying (IIRC) HV field >> applied, a ball bearing placed on this began to moe in a circle, given that >> there is no obvious electromagnetic mechanism for such a behavior and we >> are looking for evidence of some type of "Aerther Vortex" involved with >> large HV appropriately designed capacitors then this also supports the the >> picture being painted here. >> >> In addition, I also at one point (wish I had kept track of it) multiple >> claims of circular (might have been spheres actually) charged with high >> voltage DC in association with a second pole, and a torque being noticed on >> the components, essentially another case supporting a circular force from >> HV capacitors that seems not to be easily explained by electrodynamic >> forces. >> >> Then there is the Ducret house account mentioned in the Ether Technology >> book by Rho Sigma, it was dielectric disk which under the influence of high >> voltage rotated then becoming airborne, in this case I believe the rotation >> was easily explained by electrostatic motor effects but the levitation >> while not a perfect match seems to be potentially relevant. >> >> There was also a man, who's name eludes me at present but the account is >> not unknown, he had a device he demonstrated at the World's fair, he >> described it as a "Rotary Condenser" and and weight loss was demonstrated, >> though there is no image of the device, but the name certainly leads to >> plausibility that it is perhaps related. >> >> The next is Alexey Chekurkov, while his device has more going on than >> just a circular HV capacitor, it DOES satisfy that requirement and produces >> levitation! It also has a mix of DC and AC high voltages (Hutchison >> Effect0 and magnets and counter-rotation but that makes sense of his >> effects being relatively effective with a poorer electrical capacity than >> say the ARV or Cap Warp. >> Interestingly I have now found that Alexey is selling kits and I would be >> curious as to the cost if they are still available. >> Also while looking for his channel I see a Retro Reflector capacitor >> design that is a perfect copy for something I have been working on, I have >> yet to watch his videos about it but here are two: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CK-XxlMw3fA and >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rF-vwk5K3s >> >> Ok, so what of my own research? >> Well, I saw a correlation that actually others also saw, it might be >> obvious if you look at this graphic: https://ibb.co/BVmNxFm >> That list isn't exhaustive, for instance just today I was marvelling over >> the similarity of the Leedskalnin rotor which has 24 Horseshoe magnets with >> poles facing out, which one attempted replicator noticed to create a visual >> disturbance. >> And this is most interesting as there is a researcher by the name >> Ferlini, he put 4 Horseshoe magnets with poles in, he tuned the spacing to >> balance out the two paths the fux could take, either shorting between the >> poles of each the other end of each horseshoe or going to the neighboring >> horse shoe. When he did this over time the table became fuzzy as a visual >> disturbance was created, and then eventually a myst was created, you know >> what else this reminds me of??? >> >> The Stan Deyo claim of a researcher to made an antigravity device known >> as the wedding cake, it includes both of these elements, visual disturbed >> space and split rings of magnetic materials! >> >> Has anyone else put those 3 claims together? Does anyone else even know >> of those 3 claims? >> Ok, so why am I saying this is my research??? >> Well you see I have been able to feel this "aether vortex energy" quite >> keenly since 2012 when I made a coil that charged my hand, and I have had >> many feel the energy from my designs including when they were hidden and >> the people knew nothing of my work. >> >> The point is that one thing I have discovered is that you need 2 things, >> you need to encourage rotation of energies but ALSO you need to create some >> resistance or turbulence in the flow. >> Imagine having your cars wheels off the ground and you get it going, the >> wheels are spinning but they are cold, no heat, or maybe they aren't >> spinning and you have the brakes on hard, again, nothing. >> But if you apply the gas and brakes either to the right level or >> alternately then the wheels rotate AND heat is generated as the disc brakes >> experience friction. >> >> This is an apt analogy for what I have found occurs with designs that >> make an aether vortex, though the majority of my work has been unpowered >> and no magnets or HV used. I have seen this numerous times. >> Sometimes a design won't be strong but I will add something that produces >> resistance, it will be intense and then drop to a low energy as the >> resistance was too high. >> Or there will be "energy" in motion and it will get faster and faster and >> faster and it becomes less and less substantial till I can't feel it >> anymore! >> >> Consider the difference between a river with laminar flow you wouldn't >> even know was flowing, .vs one with rocks that makes white water, or indeed >> I have a shower head with ceramic balls and this induced turbulence makes >> the water feel a lot harder and more solid! >> >> Well, my research also concludes that the electric type energies in the >> aether have a spin, and the positive and negative energies tend to move in >> opposite directions and as such they collide making heat, this stops motion. >> But the separation with an electric field allows these energies to pass >> without collision, but perhaps the best is some balance between the two >> effects, either a dynamic balance or a static one. >> >> We might also look at the Hamel device which has a few claims of partial >> and full successful reproduction, one guy with partial success I actually >> visited! >> His rings became charged electrostatically, but if there is any circular >> motion in that space the magnetic field would create a vertical electric >> force separating positive and negative charges! >> >> So because the effect isn't direct, a circular HV capacitor doesn't >> ensure an aether vortex, it makes it likely and if it happens antigravity >> might result. >> But it is important to realize why negative results don't "Debunk" >> something including the obvious fact that a negative result can be either >> incompetent or sometimes IT is the lie! >> >> Consider that Marc McCandlish the artist who drew the thing and promoted >> it, and the man who made the documentary have both died mysteriously. >> Stefan Marinov, who claimed a rotating field created by magnetic means >> (Magnetic Vortex Hyper-Ionization Device (MAGVID) suddenly committed >> suiscide mysteriously, there is no shortage of such mysterious deaths and >> suicides. >> The point is that if "they" have a history of killing, threatening and >> buying people off we would be foolish to assume they aren't going to have a >> few accounts that say "I tried this and it failed". >> >> So between the suppression efforts (albeit inconsistent) and the >> complexities of an effect that isn't directly electromagnetic and involves >> new physics that is hardly understood by convention at all... >> It shouldn't surprise that sometimes things fail, there are many cases of >> competent scientists failing to replicate something that is now well >> established as real. >> >> So be careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water! >> >> Consider also the Joe Cell, it is lifeless until it is given a charge by >> a battery, sure it's not high voltage but it is a capacitor of sorts with >> water as the dielectric (ideally nothing to make it conductive is used) and >> Antigravity has been claimed from the Joe Cell. And many have claimed some >> degree of success with it that can't be explained as conventional >> electrolysis, including a friend. >> >> Ok, let's consider LENR, Bob Greenyer of the Martin Fleischmann Memorial >> Project has a LOT of photographic evidence for a Toroidal form that gets >> created and imprinted on metal from Cold Fusion, Ken Shoulders charge >> Cluster (EVO, Exotic vacuum Objects) Hutchison Effect samples, and many >> many more places, this structure is very similar to the coil I first made >> that I felt emit an energy, it is a coil made of a coil, Russians who made >> a coil of a coil of a coil (maybe another level?) input power and had a >> signal come out for days after it was disconnected, shades of Stevem Mark's >> TPU which fits perfectly with what I have been talking about with respect >> to balancing acceleration and resistance, his devices could go into a >> meltdown mode. >> >> So what do we have here? >> A stunning number of coincidences and liars? >> >> Or something real? >> >> Does it cost anything (except possibly your life if you make too >> extraordinary claims and your standing/respect by those who would have also >> scoffed at the Write Brother's before their flight...). >> No, this research can be done safely and with no expense, truly I have >> developed very postent unpowered designs can be can made with no cost >> (because yes, EM/Light affects the aether so even images will do as Dan A. >> Davidson also claimed) or just bits of any garden/craft or electrical wire >> that is easy to bend, a majority (but far from everyone) of people can feel >> this phenomena. >> Admittedly the odds are lower among skeptical types which seems to >> include scientists and yet there are absolute skeptics who have felt the >> energy. >> >> There are people who have felt energy from designs that were hidden they >> knew nothing of. >> >> This research that can be instrumental in humanity surviving and thriving >> is easily accessible but I think that there are concerted efforts to >> suppress such and perhaps even at the Psychic level. >> See this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9hwXoCrEUs >> >> And I think after watching that you could conclude that there are >> influences opposed to humanity delving into this technology. >> >> Of course if we switch the electric to magnetic we can also consider >> Podkletnov, John Schnurer (previously on this list) and Ning Li all making >> claims about gravity reduction from a rotating field under a superconductor. >> >> The point is that there are threads whough this technology and sometimes >> it might be explain away as researcher B knowing about researcher A's >> claims, but other times it seems that they are truly independent, no one >> would assume that the Stan Deyo Wedding Cake design, the Ferlini design and >> the Leedskalnin design would have been known likely known to each other or >> have taken any part in their efforts/claims even if perhaps Ferlini might >> have known of Leedskalnin's work for instance, the visual disturbance angle >> was only mentioned more recently by an experimenter who tried to replicate >> Leedskalnin's work, and he wouldn't have known of Ferlini as Ferlini is NOT >> well known. >> >> Interestingly the vanishing paper clip report where a kid energized a >> steel loop antenna with a paperclip hanging in the center that someone left >> on the Bill Beaty's site for reporting anomalies potentially fits as it has >> a circular magnetic circuit with a break and a visual disturbance >> (invisibility), BTW I have a fiend who is in contact with kid/man who did >> this experiment. >> >> And it is interesting is it not that magnetic materials, iron which has a >> huge value for it's magnetic permeability when cut open can release an >> "aetheric energy" that affects the index of reflection? >> Does that not make a little too much sense to ignore?! >> >> If the properties of the iron were being displaced into space, you could >> see it as the "ghost" of the iron atoms being pushed out of the >> iron/magnetic circuit much like Dr Strange is pushed out of his body, just >> as many NDE/OBE's have people out of their body. >> >> Why should ghosts just be for people? >> My argument is that there is stuff in space that becomes disturbed by and >> has a memetic property for the matter and the energy that disturbs it. >> We can also look at how Homeopathic tinctures are made, they dilute yes, >> but then they apply 'succession" which means whacking the bottle against a >> firm surface that is just soft enough not to break the bottle. >> >> The same effect has been seen in some tests of Inertial propulsion and >> other situations where mass has been suddenly stopped, SOMETHiNG has been >> propelled out of the matter as it hasn't stopped as willingly as matter. >> Indeed I asked a specific claimant who had made an inertial propulsion >> device that for argument's sake is similar to the Dean Drive and indeed >> they confirmed that people had noticed just such a phenomena. >> >> Even Einstein believed there was an Aether (just one one responsible for >> the reference frame of light speed) and General Relativity requires it. >> Actually the inflationary universe theory has moving space also. >> Even though conventional science acknowledges the existence of many >> "aethers" by various different names (seldom using that word) it is worth >> noting that no one, not Einstein or anyone since has an explanation for how >> the one way speed of light can be C in all frames of motion! >> >> It is merely argued that the one way speed of light can't me measured, >> and yet if we assume that Lorentz aEther Theory (LET) is correct then we >> get the same essential predictions that Special Relativity (SR) makes, only >> we don't have to accept ANY of the contradictions and paradoxes. Light >> doesn't magically travel at C relative to all observers in all inertial >> frames (unless they drag their frame with them, and then only the light in >> the area they drag) and what's more we can then actually measure the one >> way speed of light, not easily but if there are prefered frames then we can >> see where length is longest and time is fastest, this will give us our >> stationary frame. >> >> In addition, there is an easy way to measure the one way speed of light, >> you simply need to synchronize your clocks in a reference frame that is >> closer to the prefered frame than when you do the experiment with 2 clocks. >> If the clocks are synchronized with a zero or 9relatively) low difference >> in speed between the laboratory and the prefered frame then the >> de-synchronization between them is zero or (relatively) low. >> >> If we then accelerate the laboratory (the clocks) to 99.99999995 of the >> speed of light for arguments sake then the difference between the prefered >> frame and the laboratory frame is huge, but we synchronized the clocks >> without that large a degree of difference and now light goes MUCH faster in >> one direction that the other according to our clocks synchronized in a >> different frame. >> >> It is also note-worthy that essentially instantaneous communication (at >> least not affected by Doppler shift) between a party moving near light >> speed and one presumed to be stationary IS possible. >> It just requires that you communicate with someone you are passing by in >> your spaceship, the window of time is tiny but not zero unless you go into >> orbit around then you can be in constant and with huge G-forces near >> instantaneous communication. >> >> The point is that all he assumptions of Relativity fall apart and it is >> kept together due to the reluctance to accept the existence of an aether >> even though Noble Prize winning Physicist Frank Wilcze in his lecture music >> of the void goes into detail about how matter itself seems to just be a >> disturbance of space itself,just motion of "nothing" making something! But >> obviously it's just that we don't know what is moving. >> >> This technology is of great importance and there is a real effort, maybe >> even a non-human influence to dissuade us, consider how fast early progress >> seems to have been made in this field, the World Fair I mentioned was in >> Tesla's time, The research by Nazi's, a whole other can of worms, and >> Tesla's and even evidence Marconi might have dabbled in this direction was >> very early and things got shut down, both suppressed by those who have no >> doubt developed the technology for themselves and also those who don't want >> humanity at large to get this technology, there is ample reason to think >> that there is ET involvement in back projects and the like, also it is >> worth noting that freaky call to Art Bell when power was suddenly lost. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHXTfc6Jpvo&t=1s >> >> The point is that we have to consider that a lot has been opposing this >> research at every turn! >> >> And, ironically even a list named Vortex because, well I presume the hint >> is so strong that all of this mysterious phenomena is related to vortices, >> indeed very strange phenomena, impossible phenomena similar to the >> Hutchison Effect has been witnessed from Hurricanes and Tornadoes. >> But even this list isn't actually receptive to such subjects! >> >> Thus it is no wonder that this doesn't go anywhere, there is just no >> concerted effort, or, maybe more to the point there is a deafening silence >> and disinterest! >> >> Nothing should interest man more, has more promise and potential than >> this. >> So why is there this resistance? >> >> >> I guess I have to end this somewhere. >> >> Jonathan. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
