Howdy Frank,
Which is also an excellent theoretical description of the principle of the Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube.
Richard
----- Original Message ----- From: "Grimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?


At 10:16 pm 15/03/2006 -0900, Horace wrote:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060315174950.htm

"This ring means that three objects are entangled.
If you pick up any one of them, the other two will follow.
However, if you cut one of them off, the other two will
fall apart," Chin said. "There is something magic about
this number of three."

"If you can create this kind of state out of any other type of
particle, it'll have exactly the same behavior," Chin said.


The article also goes on to say,

   =============================================
   Today, nanotechnology researchers can combine
   atoms in novel ways to form materials with
   interesting new properties, "but you are not
   changing the fundamental interactions of these
   atoms," Chin said. That can only be done at
   temperatures near absolute zero.
   "At the moment, I don't see how this can be
   done at much higher temperatures," he said.
   ============================================

I can.  8-)

Lowering the temperature is increasing the Compreture
pressure. Lowering the Beta-atmosphere pressure by
the 12th power three dimensional Casimir action will
be the equivalent of increasing Compreture.


This is a cryogenic state, but one has to wonder
about the possibility of a similar state existing
in a lattice for a sufficient time to produce
multi-nuclear LENR.


One need wonder no longer.  8-)

This is how Cold Fusion works as I explained in
the Infinite Energy magazine article. Lowering
temperature is increasing the numerator. Lowering
Beta-atmosphere pressure is decreasing the denominator.

Curiously enough, it literally is Cold Fusion -
bloody cold - or the Beta-atmosphere equivalent of
"bloody cold" to be exact.

Cheers,

Frank








Reply via email to