Yes I mean drag, but there may be other aerodynamic forces to consider.
Also I don't think the profile is aerodynamic because the boundary is not
crisp like a fuselage.
  
Does gf mean g-force? If so that a percentage of the acceleration due to
gravity or a force as in force = ma ?

The fact that a certain current coincided with lift off does not necessarily
provide a comprehensive explanation of what makes it go. For example, the
current drawn by spark plug does not account for the motion of the blade
on a lawn mower.

Anyway, if an accelerometer were mounted on a lifter the actual dynamic
forces involved could be estimated more accurately.

Unfortunately I can't view the video on my antiquated iMac.

Harry

Michel Jullian wrote:

> I agree that the lifter's ion [induced] wind adds to the aerodynamic drag
> during ascent (I think that's what you're saying, note you could say the same
> of a helicopter's propeller induced wind)
> 
> Anyway in the case of the lifter this wind is relatively slow (of the order of
> 1 m/s, about 100 times slower than the entraining ions which are not very good
> "paddles" and not very numerous), and the profile is usually quite
> aerodynamic, so the corresponding drag is quite small. This means that in
> practice the thrust needed for takeoff isn't much more than the device's
> weight.
> 
> Example (Blazelabs 100g payload lifter): total weight of lifter + payload =
> 187gf, let's see what current is needed for a thrust of 187gf. The gap being
> 92mm, by applying the EHD thrust formula:
> 
> thrust in gf = 0.5*i*d with i in mA and d in mm
> 
> we find that we need a current of 4.1mA (187/(0.5*92)). In practice Xavier
> found that the lifter almost took off at 4.2mA, and definitely flew and tensed
> its tethers at 4.4mA:
> 
> http://www.blazelabs.com/e-exp14.asp  (do watch the video)
> 
> Michel
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:54 PM
> Subject: [Vo]: Lifter aerodynamics
> 
> 
> 
>> An "ion-wind" may produce enough force to let the lifter hover, but can
>> it produce enough force to let the lifter (and its expanded
>> electro-aeordynamic profile) _ascend_ through the air?
>> 
>> Harry
> 
> 

Reply via email to