Michel Jullian wrote:

For example, he claims the pump is running with a 10ft head, using this as an argument that it is doing work. In reality the output hose does go up 10 ft, but then it goes down 10ft (it's just flung over a 10 ft ladder) . . .

It is a siphon, in other words. There would be a transient pressure increase as the hose fills up, unless it is already filled with water before it is raised.

(Roman aqueduct builders used inverted siphons and I think they had some positive, uphill siphons. Both call for watertight and airtight pipelines. I have often wondered how they managed to start the flow of water through a positive siphons. I suppose they blocked the ends, hauled water up the hill to the high point, and filled the pipeline.)

Newman does not appear to understand some elementary concepts such as the siphon. Many years ago when I spoke with him, he did not appear to know the difference between AC and DC electricity, and why it is important to use different kinds of electric meters. A prominent Japanese researcher who claimed a magnetic motor effect made this same mistake.

I cannot judge whether Newman really does not understand what a siphon is, or whether he understands and he is trying to deceive his audience. When we discussed the power meters, he seemed sincerely confused. I know many fringe inventors who I think are making mistakes, but they sincerely believe their own claims, so it is not fair to call them "scams." Anyway, we should not try to be mind-readers so it is more appropriate to say Newman is wrong, and leave it at that.

If Newman were to demonstrate the gadget in front of an educated audience of engineers or scientists, the moment he threw the hose over the ladder and announced that it now has a 10 foot head people would laugh and tell him he is wrong, so I suppose this audience is either uneducated, or they are only watching for amusement only and they do not take him seriously.

It should be noted that some educated observers have examined the Newman device, and they feel there may be something to it.

- Jed

Reply via email to