See:
Rout, R.K., et al., Reproducible, anomalous
emissions from palladium deuteride/hydride. Fusion Technol., 1996. 30: p. 273.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RoutRKreproducib.pdf
Rout, R.K., et al., Detection of high tritium
activity on the central titanium electrode of a
plasma focus device. Fusion Technol., 1991. 19: p. 391.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RoutRKdetectiono.pdf
This stuff is astounding. I should have looked at
it more closely years ago. I do not know enough
about theory to hazard a guess what it might
mean, but I'll bet it trashes all mainstream
theories of cold fusion, and much else. I suppose
the only thing it might support would be the
Fisher theory (tested by Oriani, see paper by), and Mills' hydrino theory.
I think Rout et al. have enormous credibility.
By the way, I asked Srinivasan about the
descrepancy pointed out here previously. He is
asking Rout. Here is the text I sent him --
The discrepancy is in these statements:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RoutRKphenomenon.pdf
"In all the autoradiographs obtained (under any
condition), the fogging was always observed only
on the side of the film facing the samples, in
spite of the fact that the X-ray film is
transparent to optical radiation and had
sensitive coating on both sides. This confirms
the low range of the radiations and absence of optical emissions."
Versus this paper:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RoutRKautoradiog.pdf
"In order to achieve good resolution of the
image, the sample was kept very close to the
X-ray film. Standard medical X-ray film of medium
grain size (10 to 15 µm in diameter) on cellulose
triacetate base was used for this purpose. The
exposure time used for the deuterated samples
varied from 18 hours to a few days. At times a
stack of several films was used. In some cases
films were placed on both sides of the sample."
- Jed
