Well spotted in any case! BTW Ron hasn't answered my question unless I missed it: what does he measure on the 1 ohm resistors, just input and output currents, or...? Maybe someone else knows the answer?
Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hoyt A. Stearns Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 5:52 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]: CE4 > Hi Dr. B. > > I haven't looked at the project at all yet, being too busy with my Steorn > and Noether's theorem experiments, as well as some activity with some new > tip propulsion helicopter activity. I guess I'll get to it eventually. > There's just so much material to investigate ( good or bad thing depending > on how you look at it ( It sure keeps us active and alive! ) :-) :-( ). > > Hoyt Stearns > Scottsdale, Arizona > http://HoytStearns.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 4:29 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]: CE4 > > > So Hoyt -- > > Have you replicated this circuit using a cannibalized TV xtal ? > > > > Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote: >> 3.58 MHz is probably a rounded version of 3.579545, the most common xtal > in >> the world -- the NTSC color subcarrier frequency. >> >> >> Hoyt Stearns >> Scottsdale, Arizona >> http://HoytStearns.com > > > > >>> I will show that later (a 5V dip oscillator), this should >>> solves a bit of the trouble with the gen drift. >> >> What about a X-tal OC for generating a signal at a specific frequency : >> >> http://www.t-mallusa.com/product_info.php?products_id=2894878 >> >> Two problems - there is none available AFAIK which oscillates at >> *exactly* the frequency you found for your circuit 3.58 MHz, but >> assuming that one can adjust the core (filing), or the windings or the >> beads in the circuit in order to match the OC frequency - this one might >> be more efficient than the 5V , as it is a lower voltage part (3.3). >> >> >
