Who's speaking? ;-) Ron, you should really sign your posts, "they" will get you all the same...
I still don't get it, you measure voltage drop on (V) and current through (I) each 1 ohm? (that on the input circuit, and that on the output circuit). And what do you do with those? Suggestion: you should show the measuring resistors and indicate the various signals on your circuit diagram. Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "EnergyLab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:23 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: CE4 > Michel; > > Sorry, but I'm not paying attention to much of anything other than trying to > do what is normal and get the web page populated with information. I feel > its counter productive to answer on an individual level until I present all > available info in ONE place. Already there is so many bits and pieces around > the net, some partly complete, some incomplete and some just plain wrong. > > In short the SS site will be the answer location. I have found it much > better to just delete my mail for awhile, but I do scan where possible for > ones I should maybe answer. > > Your question - The answer is the impedance of the secondary is well above > 10meg ohm (maybe more in #4) and even a 2cm bare wire added to it upsets the > readings and available power. The 10meg is a value obtained from an earlier > work that will also be on the page (when finished). For why I only measure > VI on a 1ohm is that the reading is in phase there. Scope readings are out > of the question on the circuit shown in video #4 and there is no cap present > at the output of the rectifiers. With other more productive circuits other > measurements are maybe a bit better, but anything on the secondary is IFFY. > > I have a number of cultures to view that have been on hold for two may hours > now, so things are not moving at the speed people want (so it appears). > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michel Jullian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:53 AM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: [Vo]:Re: CE4 > > > Well spotted in any case! > > BTW Ron hasn't answered my question unless I missed it: what does he measure > on the 1 ohm resistors, just input and output currents, or...? Maybe someone > else knows the answer? > > Michel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hoyt A. Stearns Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 5:52 AM > Subject: RE: [Vo]: CE4 > > >> Hi Dr. B. >> >> I haven't looked at the project at all yet, being too busy with my Steorn >> and Noether's theorem experiments, as well as some activity with some new >> tip propulsion helicopter activity. I guess I'll get to it eventually. >> There's just so much material to investigate ( good or bad thing depending >> on how you look at it ( It sure keeps us active and alive! ) :-) :-( ). >> >> Hoyt Stearns >> Scottsdale, Arizona >> http://HoytStearns.com >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 4:29 PM >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Subject: Re: [Vo]: CE4 >> >> >> So Hoyt -- >> >> Have you replicated this circuit using a cannibalized TV xtal ? >> >> >> >> Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote: >>> 3.58 MHz is probably a rounded version of 3.579545, the most common xtal >> in >>> the world -- the NTSC color subcarrier frequency. >>> >>> >>> Hoyt Stearns >>> Scottsdale, Arizona >>> http://HoytStearns.com >> >> >> >> >>>> I will show that later (a 5V dip oscillator), this should >>>> solves a bit of the trouble with the gen drift. >>> >>> What about a X-tal OC for generating a signal at a specific frequency : >>> >>> http://www.t-mallusa.com/product_info.php?products_id=2894878 >>> >>> Two problems - there is none available AFAIK which oscillates at >>> *exactly* the frequency you found for your circuit 3.58 MHz, but >>> assuming that one can adjust the core (filing), or the windings or the >>> beads in the circuit in order to match the OC frequency - this one might >>> be more efficient than the 5V , as it is a lower voltage part (3.3). >>> >>> >> > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.8/1066 - Release Date: 10/12/2007 > 11:10 AM > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.8/1066 - Release Date: 10/12/2007 > 11:10 AM >
