One key detail which is the basis for Halliburton's
technology (and much of their wealth)- although it is
not widely appreciated outside the industry, is that
in the last decade, in addition to traditional oil
exploration, they have looked specifically for deep
*coal*. 

"Look" instead of "drill" is the operative word.

"Coal?" you say, "why coal?" Traditional natural gas
deposits, per se, are not found in the same formations
as coal. Nowadays you often must drill in 1000 feet of
ocean to find new natural gas, since those deposits
are found in salt domes in what was once geologically
deep ocean... whereas coal beds were more often formed
in bogs or shallow land seas, which is now under dry
land. 

To find these prime deep coal locations, if one is
secretive enough, one does even have to drill, at
least not always- and need only to search through the
archived records of past drilling, which every state
requires to be kept in official records.

There is a long history of drilling in the USA in
almost every state. Some states have over one million
wells which have been drilled over the past 150 years.
Most of the efforts turn out to be "dry" but many old
bore holes hit deep coal.... Useless (heretofore).

Before perfecting the fracture drilling method(s),
some of which are trade secrets, not patented, and
cannot be used in the USA, due to risks and laws,
Halliburton was able to get hold of the mineral rights
for many of these deep coal seams - for cheap, for
course ... since deep coal was deemed to be of little
commercial value. 

Outside of Russia and S.Africa, you cannot find many
miners willing to do the dangerous work of mining deep
coal. Subterranean coal seams contain substantial
quantities of methane. This has been a hazard of deep
coal mining for centuries. This is especially true of
Eastern USA coal. Thousands of coal miners have died
as a result of this.

Conventional natural gas reservoir store methane as a
free gas under pressure, often in a domed salt
formation, which seal-in the gas. Coal's unique
structure allows it to store the gas through direct
adsorption onto its carbon surface.

According to the patents, methane adsorbs into
micropores on the surface of coal- 10 to 100 square
meters of surface area per gram of coal, giving coal
beds the capacity to adsorb significant amounts of
gas, often more than the same volume of traditional
salt domes. 

It is released by hydraulic fracturing of plate
boundaries. Halliburton previously (under Cheney's
reign) had bought-up, some say "stole" the
intellectual property, but then was able to perfect
most of the patents and IP related to this technology
into a robust technique.

The beauty of this process for deep beds is that once
some of the layers in the coal seam (usually a
horizontal stratus) is fractured, and part of the gas
has been released, then the compression-structure of
the bed will further micro-fracture under the billion
ton weight of the overburden, and more and more gas is
released. It is an unexpected synergy.

That is the better known part of the story, related to
US production of gas from deep coal beds. Fracture
drilling has other uses as well but none compare to
this technology, in terms of ROI.

In areas in the rest of the world, especially deserts,
where the drilling restrictions are non-existent or
more lax (i.e. the 'mordida' in Latin countries) there
is much more going on than we know about. Halliburton
has about the same level of secrecy (and use of strong
arm tactics) as the CIA. 

Why do you think Halliburton is moving to Dubai?
(besides the possibility of having all of their assets
seized, if the Dem-wits should win the White House)?

Well, in one hypothesis, some of that rationale might
have direct relevance to CANR!

As Paul Harvey would say, stay tuned for the rest of
the story ... (teaser: page 2 will be "the CANR
connection" to the advance extraction of deep oil and
gas from otherwise "dry" deposits)

Jones


Reply via email to