Thanks for the clarification, Mark.

Could you possibly expand on the topic of energy harvesting that
Graham was going to share with the Mag Conf?

Thanks,

Terry

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Mark Goldes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just in our WA lab with Graham today and assure you his status with
> MPI is unchanged.
>
> The Magnetics Conference apparently has a skeptic regarding magnetic energy
> amplification. Not surprising. Until independent lab validation of our work
> takes place, as I have said many times, skepticism is to be expected.
>
> We were surprised to be invited to present and not surprised to be
> uninvited. The presentation would probably have been premature.
>
> Our purpose was to suggest certain core materials might want to be produced
> in quantity that are presently hard to obtain. We can certainly contact the
> firms that can make those cores privately and that may prove to be the wiser
> course.
>
> Mark
>
>
> Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw this on overunity.com:
>
> http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4167.0.html
>
> Re: Magnetic Power Inc - second Patent pending
> « Reply #13 on: April 18, 2008, 03:58:00 AM » Quote
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @Pennies
>
> I appreciate your attention to detail! I hadn't noticed that they
> took Graham out of the executive summary. He must have been removed
> this month.
>
> And the fact that Graham pulled out of the Magnetic Conference...it
> all points to him leaving the company.
>
> Here was the title of his presentation, which was on the Magnetic
> Conference site:
> "The Magnetomechanical Effect: New Products and Materials in the
> Magnetics Industry for Pressure Sensors, transducers, and Energy
> Harvesting Graham Gunderson, Senior Development Engineer, Magnetic
> Power, Inc."
>
> Maybe Mark could comment here.
>
>
>
> "Energy Harvesting". Interesting term.
>
> Anyone know where GG is? If he's looking for a job, I might know of
> one perfectly suited for him.
>
> Terry
>
>
>

Reply via email to