I've been thinking about this since you posted about a month ago. How photo photo-sensitive is chlorine in the UV range? One of the problems mills has is getting enough mono-atomic hydrogen for his catalytic reaction. I'm thinking the HCl serves another much simpler purpose.
HCl + uv -> H + Cl Cl + H2 -> HCl + H Thus acting as a catalyst to provide monoatomic Hydrogen. Putting this in his solid "fuel" may simply be increasing the amount of atomic hydrogen for his hydrino catalytic reaction. Sorry if my chemistry background is not sufficient, I'm sure someone can tell me if I'm off base. P.S. I don't post much, but I do enjoy and follow this group closely. C. Michael Crosiar --- On Wed, 5/21/08, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Vo]:Chlorine photo-reactivity > To: "vortex" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2008, 10:22 AM > Here is a "pale green" musing on a possible route > to > overunity based on a reappraisal of Mills' CQM. > [pale green as in the color of chlorine] > > Subtitled: waste-to-wonderful > > FACT: High resolution photoabsorption spectra of > hydrogen chloride gas (HCl) have measured the chlorine > K edge in the 2810–2850 eV photon energy range. ref > below. > > FACT: If a gamma (x-ray) photon is made available in > the middle of this range, say it is 2829-2830 eV... > and say it is derived from nuclear reactor > "waste" > which has been alloyed with certain re-emitter > dilutents (like scandium) in order to maximize photon > radiation in this range... > > (i.e. "waste" is from concentrated spent reactor > fuel, > which was formerly called high level waste - but may > soon be called "2nd generation fuel" ;-) > > LOGICAL SUPPOSITION: > > ... strikes a hydrogen chloride molecule, then the > result is that the gamma should be resonant to > knock-out one of the k shell electrons occasionally. > > ALMOST MILLSEAN: > > Mills has never claimed that chlorine is hydrino > catalyst- and for good reason. It isn't one under > normal conditions. > > Let us hypothesize, in a warped version of the CQM > tradition, that the free proton of that HCL molecule, > or even one in an adjoining molecule, will be poised > to "capture" this emitted k-shell electron of > ~2830 eV > which was knocked out by the gamma - since that value > does represents a redundant ground state in CQM. > > If this were pure Millsean theory, the M.O. would > operate the other way around, and it would be the > resultant k-shell "hole" which would be filled > with a > monatomic H atom, which is unlikely to be present. > > Ergo, the above scenario is an alternative > explanation, based on Mills theory, but also is > absolutely contrary to anything Mills has published > heretofore, or in any of his patents. > > EVEN MORE UNMILLSEAN: > > The Mössbauer limited chain reaction: > > Following the initial electron dislodging and > recapture, a soft gamma of the exact same energy level > will be then be released from that capture; following > which, in a Mössbauer-like fashion, there follows a > limited chain reaction of resonant soft x-rays of > ~2830 eV depending on the population of HCL which can > be accommodated in such a device.... > > It so happens that - in a warped variation of Mills > CQM hypothesis - this value ~2830 eV corresponds to a > shrinkage level of 104. That is: > > 104 x 27.2 = ~2829 eV > > Hmmm... nuclear waste being converted to high energy > fuel ... > > Lemons from lemonade? ... or if we want to keep things > pale green, how about: limes to limeade? > > Jones > > BTW- a fellow name Scragg anticipated the HCl reactor > 24 years ago, based on his understanding of what > George Kistiakowsky had done in the Manhattan project, > and patented a version of it: US Patent # 4,426,354 > > Ref: > "Chlorine K shell photoabsorption spectra of gas phase > HCl and Cl2 molecules" Zeitschrift für Physik D > Volume 17, Number 4 / December, 1990
