They sent in samples to labs already. Prelim results to be announced Friday,
according to the video report. 

And what's the difference between a bigfoot and a skunk ape or swamp ape
anyway? That looks like the old skunk ape to me. I guess the DNA results
will tell us for sure. <g>

What I find even more interesting is that hairless chupacabra coyote. Looks
like something the government would have bred and released as a decoy to
cover for the real deal. The original winged chupster has certain
electro-acoustic antigravity abilities that need to be kept hush hush, you
see. Remember those reports of that weird buzzing noise they make when they
get an orange glow around them and seem to use far less wing action than
would be needed for slow/hovering flight? BzzzzzZZZZT!

- Rick


-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bigfoot Found



Terry Blanton wrote:
> The inbreeding in North Georgia is getting out of hand:
> 
> http://www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk/weird-world/Is-this-really-Bigf
> oot.4391622.jp

Well let's see what they say about the evidence.  If they've really got a
Bigfoot, all they need to do is call in a couple of anthropologists to look
at the body, and maybe get a lab somewhere to do some genetic testing, and
it's game over, right?

Strange, they're not doing either of those things:

> And to back up their astonishing story, they say they intend to 
> present conclusive proof at a press conference

They're holding a press conference, and presenting their own "proof" to a
room full of reporters.

Of course, as hunters, they're also expert anthropologists and biologists --
or so they apparently are reasoning -- and so they are the obvious ones to
study the find, rather than, say, someone with some initials after his or
her name who hails from a local university.

And the expert opinion of the reporters at the press conference will confirm
them in their expert conclusions as hunters.

If it's not a hoax, it sure smells like one.


> 
> Cryptozologist Loren Coleman thinks this could be real.  He is usually 
> quite the skeptic.
> 
> Terry
> 



Reply via email to