It's a hoax, just a halloween mask and a box of fur and stuff. Didn't see this at first because the details were dark in the image of the head. All it took was lightening the image to see the nostrils and other structure around the face. There is an apparent 100% correspondence between the form and proportion of the visible features of the face in the BF photo to those of the halloween costume mask. The features of the nostrils are very distinctive and easily seen once the image is lightened, and seeing them in the context with the other features and the exact placement and proportion leaves no doubt at all. Check George Noory's site (Art Bell's old radio show site) for a side by side.
Disappointing. -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bigfoot Found Groan! Jeeze, guys! It called a freakin' DISSECTION, not an autopsy. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,404805,00.html Note that noone speaks of the smell. BF is supposed to stink horrorshow alive. Imagine how a corpse must reek! Quack! Terry On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Rick Monteverde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > They sent in samples to labs already. Prelim results to be announced > Friday, according to the video report. > > And what's the difference between a bigfoot and a skunk ape or swamp > ape anyway? That looks like the old skunk ape to me. I guess the DNA > results will tell us for sure. <g> > > What I find even more interesting is that hairless chupacabra coyote. > Looks like something the government would have bred and released as a > decoy to cover for the real deal. The original winged chupster has > certain electro-acoustic antigravity abilities that need to be kept > hush hush, you see. Remember those reports of that weird buzzing noise > they make when they get an orange glow around them and seem to use far > less wing action than would be needed for slow/hovering flight? BzzzzzZZZZT! > > - Rick > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 7:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bigfoot Found > > > > Terry Blanton wrote: >> The inbreeding in North Georgia is getting out of hand: >> >> http://www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk/weird-world/Is-this-really-Big >> f >> oot.4391622.jp > > Well let's see what they say about the evidence. If they've really > got a Bigfoot, all they need to do is call in a couple of > anthropologists to look at the body, and maybe get a lab somewhere to > do some genetic testing, and it's game over, right? > > Strange, they're not doing either of those things: > >> And to back up their astonishing story, they say they intend to >> present conclusive proof at a press conference > > They're holding a press conference, and presenting their own "proof" > to a room full of reporters. > > Of course, as hunters, they're also expert anthropologists and > biologists -- or so they apparently are reasoning -- and so they are > the obvious ones to study the find, rather than, say, someone with > some initials after his or her name who hails from a local university. > > And the expert opinion of the reporters at the press conference will > confirm them in their expert conclusions as hunters. > > If it's not a hoax, it sure smells like one. > > >> >> Cryptozologist Loren Coleman thinks this could be real. He is >> usually quite the skeptic. >> >> Terry >> > > > >
