Howdy Vorts, I would have preferred the descriptive wording of this press release be more scientific. When dealing with theoritical physics it is always best to describe most sub-atomic theory as theoritical imagination since science has NOT been able to confirm the explanations as claimed in the article. This is more artistic liscense than pure science. LENR science has been roasted on the spit for better science and theory.
Richard http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27057042 The spontaneous broken symmetries that Nambu studied, differ from the broken symmetries described by Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa," the academy said. "These spontaneous occurrences seem to have existed in nature since the very beginning of the universe and came as a complete surprise when they first appeared in particle experiments in 1964." The academy added that it was only in recent years that scientists have been able to confirm the explanations that Kobayashi and Maskawa proffered in 1972. "These predicted, hypothetical new quarks have recently appeared in physics experiments. As late as 2001, the two particle detectors BaBar at Stanford ... and Belle at Tsukuba, Japan, both detected broken symmetries independently of each other. The results were exactly as Kobayashi and Maskawa had predicted almost three decades earlier," the citation said.
