Hi Thomas, Good letter. Some Kozyrev results which are inconvenient elsewhere on the web are organized here:
http://www.avonhistory.org/hist/kozyrev.htm http://www.avonhistory.org/hist/shipov.htm http://www.avonhistory.org/hist/tordetec.htm Jack Smith thomas malloy wrote: > > Vortexians; > > What you you think of this letter? > > Shirley Jackson, Ph D > > President Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > > Dear Dr. Jackson; > > I saw a broadcast of your address at the Bakken Museum > on Twincities Public Television. You seem interested in > innovation, so there are some matters that I'd like to > bring to your attention. > > There is a basis in theoretical physics to believe that the > zero point energy could be cohered to provide a pollution > free source of energy. The quantum theorist Hal Puthoff > of earthtech.org has coauthored a series of articles > which were published in Physical Review. They speculate > about the interaction of the ZPE and matter. It appears > that the effect can be optimized by use of torsion field > physics of Nicloi Kozyrev. > > Despite well documented replication of anomalous energy, > in these experiments, the American Physical Society treats > this technology like it doesn't exist. We have to self fund > our experimental activities. Worse, there is also a well > documented pattern of suppression of this technology. I > will probably have to leave America in order to bring this > technology to the market. > > I find this behavior inexplicable given the opposition > which has been raised to our continued poisoning of the > atmosphere with carbon dioxide. It's clear to me that we > need a Manhattan Project sized effort in order to stop this > poisoning of our environment. I have attempted to get a > commitment from President Obama putting his administration > on record as opposed to the continued suppression, in > vain. It would seem to me that this is the least that they > could do. > > Given your involvement with the Nuclear Regulatory > Commission, I'd also like to mention the suppression > of the use of induced nuclear reactions. The website, > lenr-carn.org has over 3000 papers, some in the form > of synopsis, others in the form of a .pdf document. I > realize that the experimental results are difficult to > reproduce, and that so far, no usable energy has been > produced. However in the 60 minutes segment on "cold > fusion" the APS's representative took the standard party > line, about not seeming to care about the experimental > results, his mind having previously been made up. > > It's clear to me that if, following the experiment; > you extract a metal which wasn't there before, and > that metal has an isotopic spectrum containing a large > amount of 2%'ers, isotopes which occur in nature in > concentrations of less than 3%, that is anomalous. This > anomaly doesn't seem to be clear to either Dr. Robert Park, > or Dr. Zimmerman. While Dr. Park was initially reported > to be contrite, following the 60 Minutes broadcast. Later > he was later back spouting the party line, of "voodoo > science." Why am I not surprised? this is the APS's > business as usual. > > I noted what appeared to be your support for that > boondoggle at Yucca Mountain. I can just imagine the > streaks of protest that would result if you attempted > to bury that waste in the layer of basalt in northern > Minnesota. I don't blame the people of Nevada one little > big for opposing it. Particularly since the technology > to render it nonradioactive was demonstrated over ten > years ago. > > Dr. Park has yet to repent of his attacks on Dr. Randall > Mills of Black Light Power, which in my opinion were as > the basis of the recension of BLP's patent. This despite > BLP's having sold licenses for it's technology.
